What would be a very similar (horsepower wise) to the 1989 Toyota Supra? It is turbo charged and bone stock!
dababiboi786/supramaniac;908819 said:Any car from any time frame. for example would a camero with an lt1 engine get burned by a 1989 supra turbo, or vis versa?
dababiboi786/supramaniac;908834 said:there is a 89 turbo supra w/ about 150,000 miles on it i wanna buy sooo bad but my dad thinks i should get a 95 v6 camaro. if i get the camaro im thinking of putting a ls1 engine in it. What do you guys think? (camaro has 90,000 miles on it)
bountykilla0118;908841 said:Get the supra or just buy a camero with an lt motor. However boost is a magical thing
If you rebuild the stock motor, upgrade the stock turbo, get some 550's injectors, lex afm or maft-pro and get it tuned and you smoke most z28/SS cameros that arent track cars.
bountykilla0118;908829 said:The stock mkIII so damn slow... The power range I would put a stock mkIII in would be the integras, civic si, all 80’s sports cars minus the high dollar cars, pretty much all 6 cylinders NA's from the 90’s up.
dababiboi786/supramaniac;908850 said:Thats exactly what i wanted to do, i just dont wanna make a mistake and get a slow car that takes 200,000 to make fast. i know people that have made over 700 horses with 50,000 or less. Ive been doing my homework on this car for about 3 years and dont know anything about camaros. But ive also seen some mean twin turbo camaros out there 2. idk im sooo confused rite now!!!!
dababiboi786/supramaniac;908850 said:Thats exactly what i wanted to do, i just dont wanna make a mistake and get a slow car that takes 200,000 to make fast. i know people that have made over 700 horses with 50,000 or less. Ive been doing my homework on this car for about 3 years and dont know anything about camaros. But ive also seen some mean twin turbo camaros out there 2. idk im sooo confused rite now!!!!
DegreE;908866 said:Racing from Dig:
1g Turbo DSM. (AWD)
300zx TT
FC RX7 Turbo
Those would be my guesses.