Yes, Hebron is near hartford, about 15 minutes. No spair turbo manifold but you get one with the deal.
It's a 89 also, manual tranny. I am thinking I want an auto for the swap
Guys, the Samuri is 1,500lbs lighter then the Supra!!, its gonna be PLENTY fast as a NA :naughty: I dont plan on any 150+ mph runs lol just some kick ass power to throw some mud with 33's!! If I wanna go fast on the road I take out my T61 powerd Supra
Well its simple, the NA makes more power low and mid where I would need it instead of making higher end power and spooling the turbo, most offroading will be slow speed crawling (rockclimbs and such) and the turbo is not gonna help me however ACIS, Acoustic controlled induction system on the...
Okay, heres the deal guys. I have a highly built up turbo Supra as some might know. I like the 7M motors alot and know them inside and out. I also have a 1988 Suzuki Samuri (mini jeep) They are excellent offroad machines but are underpowered. The engine will not push 33 inch mud boggers with...
If I take a tac reading on the signal wire goin to the ECU and then put a cap after it but before the ECU then have another tac reading the caped signal I could get the real RPM and then the RPM that the computer is reading. So as long as I keep the cap reading just below the redline I could...
According to the manual it looks like # 1&6, 4&5 and 2&3 are on the same injector signal. So when the computer knocks out a set I guess it randomly picks on one of thoes sets?
I know there have been a couple posts about this but no one ever got to the bottom of it. The ECU will cut power to a random set of injectors at or above redline. While still running a piggybacked ECU there has to be a way to cap the RPM signal much like the MAFT does with airflow signals. If I...
Allright thx, its not too bad because im running very high oil pressure anyway (around 80 PSI at high rpm) I guess its also suppose to help with turbo spool, anyone elce hear that? If so how much of a difference is it suppose to make?
For any aftermarket turbo I guess its a good idea to run a restrictor plate, especially when running higher oil pressure at the motor. Its suppose to lower the risk of flooded oil seals and also decrease spool time!! Has anyone elce herd of this? I just got my kit, I knew it was gonna restrict...
BTW, is the ACIS valve suppose to be open at WOT and closed at mid? I noticed under 0 vacume the valve is open fully acting like a turbo manifold would.
With the ACIS hooked up or not you will still get better flow into the manifold. The TB would be the last thing holding it back but even with that bottleneck you should still get better flow. Its like when you do a catback exhaust even though you still have a bottelneck you still get more power...
Okay this just came to me, I could be wrong but just think about this for a second. The turbo manifold has a 2.5 inch inlet after the TB. The NA manifold has two 2 inch inlets after the TB. So if the turbo man has a 2.5 inch inlet and the NA has a total of a 4 inch inlet wouldent the NA manifold...
"All it needs is to touch once, and it's done" To touch what Supra90turbo??
I guess most of the time its a rod bearing, is it also common for a crank bearing to go or are they less likely?
The only 2 theorys I have herd to rod knock is low on oil or water in the oil, why do they refer to...
It's not a spray... let me clarify... last time I did a HG I used the blue gasket maker and OEM gasket, (worked fine) this time im going to try the copper stuff.. The blue stuff says on the back not recomended for headgaskets (im not sure if they mean as the gasket itself or not to be used with...
im about to do a HG and was gonna try that copper stuff they have along with the OEM gasket and ARP studs, I used the blue gasket maker before also but I herd the copper gasket maker is better
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.