Search results

be careful stringing more inj onto the AIC as you're dropping impedance dramatically...which can lead to fried injector drivers.

unfortunately, yes. looks like i'm a tard and missed your q's....here goes: at this time, the MAFT pro won't be adding additional injector control. it's an option in the future (with support for two? injectors, probably not six...) but it's not on the priority list @ all....

not a problem. yessir, all that the HAC mod is a running a wirea out that allows you to turn the internal HAC on/off.

3 bar MAP = -14.5 -> 29 PSI.

wow, i couldn't have said it better myself. you da man! ;)

where exactly did i say this? if you can't tune it yourself, find someone who can....much like everything else in life- if you can't do it, you can always pay someone who can... not a problem man.

i'm not sure what issues there are....malloynx has had a few problems, but that was mostly due to his understanding of how the MAFT pro works/learning curve. interesting....if that's the case, why are you building so a highly modified car? is there a local tuner there that can assist you...

this is exactly why i wrote that FAQ. PLEASE take some time and carefully read it- all of the acronyms are explained along with each unit's function. there's also some good reading on maftpro.com...

MAP sensors are overrated....

yessir, that is correct. don't forget it's also a datalogger and MAF translator (or eliminator!).

please read my FAQ: http://mkiiitech.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=641

well, what you are hearing are standard teething problems for any new system being used by new users....take read of the AEM forums sometime, you will see far worse things there. as with any tuning device, the quality of its performance is based on the effort put into tuning it....and...

what's confusing? take a look @ my FAQ, maftpro.com and this discussion....that should cover 95% of your questions. as for installer, i would find a local speed shop you can trust. a regular mechanic MIGHT be up to it, but they typically look down on aftermarket devices... as out said...

yeah, once the timing monitor is operational, i plan on doing a lot of logging....just for my own interest. the '89+ ECU will detect improper O2 sensor performance: http://www.cygnusx1.net/supra/library/TSRM/fi/FI_026.html personally, i'm guessing the TCCS is going to go full limp w/o...

i BELIEVE so.....no hard data.

unplug the O2 and you get a code on '89+ ECUs. on both versions you go full rich....though i suppose you could tune that out.

what up? the problems you're describing apply to ANY piggy-back. the thing you really need to pay close attention to is Vf- log it and see what the TCCS is wanting to do, then make corrections to make it happy. this should clear up MOST of the issues....you'll probably never kill them all...

i wouldn't call it a pipe dream. the limiting factor is whether or not we can make the existing hardware do what we want it to.... the good news is that we'll be trying out the timing monitor next week. =)

the important thing to realize is that the unknown in every install is the person installing/tuning the device. this holds true for ANY device- SAFC/SAFR/eman/EMS/etc. we've done the best we can working with malloynx, ultimately it's up to him to make his setup work (he has a variety of things...

it really depends on how far you plan on going with the car and what YOU want to do. already got other stuff? it's probably easier to just use it. want to get rid of 239573475 separate devices? the pro might be a better choice. ultimately, it's your decision.....figure out what's right for you...