Well just like the title asks: is it a reliable car or not? If one were to do a build for example, would it be a reliable car if it were maintained? Looking at how people on the forums post or what they have as their sigs, it really makes me wonder. Not to bash those folks, but one guy has something to the effect that there will be always something wrong with the car. Another guy has something to the effect that it is basically useless as a daily driver. Still another guy made a thread that is in OT that suggested that the Supra’s engine is not reliable as is, (but that a Honda motor would make it reliable). I also seen one guy in the chatroom say that they aren’t reliable, and that a Hyundai would be better. Again, not making this thread to bash; I am just interested, that is all.
So would the Supra be not a reliable car if maintained? What about if it were properly rebuilt? I know that on all older cars, parts will wear with time and miles, I already know that cars need maintenance. On the whole and compared to others, how reliable is an MKIII? Help me get an accurate image on this car. Also, how many miles could one reasonable expect if the precautions were taken as not to get a BHG?
Thanks in advance to any that can shed light on this topic.
So would the Supra be not a reliable car if maintained? What about if it were properly rebuilt? I know that on all older cars, parts will wear with time and miles, I already know that cars need maintenance. On the whole and compared to others, how reliable is an MKIII? Help me get an accurate image on this car. Also, how many miles could one reasonable expect if the precautions were taken as not to get a BHG?
Thanks in advance to any that can shed light on this topic.