Search results

Click on that number. Amazing no?

Football is a satanic ritual...

^ And from now on, to appease jetjock, don't post that vacuum leaks cause high idle because in L type EFI systems they don't. The "turning on" thing causes confusion when dealing with crank-no start versus no cranking at all. From where I sit it's the mark of a geek who knows everything about...

I no :icon_razz

More "turning cars on"...

What does the box say about where made? Btw it's $10 cheaper on the site. $40 for a center bearing with profit. You just know that had come in on a slow boat...

Curses, foiled again. Try jacking up the radiator cap and rolling another car underneath...

Huh?

That's great stuff O.Z. Thanks for posting it.

Which is why the more automated vehicles get the less it takes to be a "mechanic". Could also be why when you look at a test for an AFM that charts resistance versus temperature (not to mention a test using only two of five fully identified terminals) nothing odd jumps out at you.

Listen to Poodles. It's pretty easy to bust/strip those buggers out. Best to just go ahead and coil them before it happens. What I did.

You could adjust the TPS and see if the code resolves. TPS may not be busted, just out of whack. If so the MIL can sub for a meter. I'm gonna back pedal and say it's possible the 31 could cause that richness. Unlikely though. Besides, the EFI system usually isn't responible for this kind of...

None of those codes should cause that much enrichment. Not in closed loop at least. See here for 51: http://www.supramania.com/forums/showthread.php?46793-Code-51

Well, it's funny if you expected the pressure to go up with the stock regulator still in there. Whether it's funny ha ha or funny strange is another matter...

You're awful quick to condemn the pump...

He's right. And how did you crank the pressure up on a stock FPR? Or are you saying you have an AFPR *and* the stock one. If so you're a funny guy...

Due to the large amounts of blowby and the use draft tubes these things are common on aircraft engines. The problem, as Jdub correctly points out, is that what they send back to the crankcase can be nasty.

^ Except it's a very poor way to jury rig a so-called solution even if that's the OP's problem. I'm guessing his real issue is crank-no-start though. Not sure but anytime someone talks about a car "turning off or on" it's usually a sign they know squat about them. That makes no sense at all...

It does remind me because you and this guy are cut from the same cloth. Think they know what they're doing, don't, and have trouble accepting it. You both get props for effort though...

Rest pressure...