Reviving this thread because I'm thinking about replacing my suspension again while the car is down getting the turbo rebuilt. Has anyone made any progress towards improving shock travel using other upper mounts / pillow balls or has Bilstein shortened the shocks at all?
Sounds like a tuning problem. Batch fire would technically have slightly less time to inject fuel per engine cycle (two revolutions) as there would be less fuel spraying while the injector is closing and opening, time for the solenoid field to build (deadtime), etc. So to get the maximum amount...
Are the Cusco or Tein upper mounts shallower than stock? It's been so long since I've seen a set I don't remember. This could allow more travel if the shock shaft sits higher.
I'm looking for info on this as well. The parts list is pretty easy to come up with. It's all in the thread on Supraforums just swap the Bilstein part numbers for mk3 units.
The concern I have is that many have complained the front Bilstein (and probably all OE replacement) shocks are too long...
They are indeed correct, the cruise does not rely on the factory ECU to function (I have multiple cars running aftermarket ECU's and cruise works fine). My 92 however cruise does not work, now I need to go check my 92T wiring diagram as I thought it used both clutch switches.
Manny, you'll need to run the "change injector" function when you right click on the fuel map. You'll also need to change the injector battery offset using the values provided with your new injectors or run the injector wizard if yours are listed.
If the turbo is new, you'll also need to tweak...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.