Ok, I have my own theory here based on some pretty decient science and facts, but what do you guys think?
*(Joel is now saying that space flight will be a popular tourist attraction in the near future, just as soon as we get the hydrogen/water thingy all worked out.)* LOL
Ok, here is the science.
First the radiation from the sun is very intense, and it's deadly. (What you can't see will kill you actually.) There are x rays and gamma rays, and other forms of particle emmisions that will kill human life in short order.
This radiation is more intense than what a nucular reactor produces, and it takes many layers of lead and other materials to shield the operators of these reactors.
Second, space is full of micro meteorites traveling at super velocities. (Just look at the moon some time, and you can see where they are hitting all the time.) The larger ones you might be able to avoid, but the microscopic ones are just as deady to anything that is not armored with an atmosphere, or tank thick resistance. (Spell that heavy armor, or miles of ever thickening gases.)
Third, many of the photos and film footage from the "moon" are so completely bogus it's not even funny. Simple things like running them at the correct frame rate solves the slow motion "1/3" gravity effect. Also many of the scale grids you see on the lunar photos have errors in them. (Missing, or out of scale, and clearly this was before photoshop, so they are doctored the old way on film, and the ones that did it, while amazing, were not perfect, and errors can be found if you know where to look.)
Ok, the last element is the background... Nobody for years noticed that the sets used on each "lunar mission" were not changed... They are ALL the same. If you take photos supposed to be from one mission and compare them to others, the background is the same in many of them. (Ones where you can see the outlines that is.) Some details have changed, like rock placement and such, but the "hills" are the same down to every detail and shape... Weird at the least, and smacks of being completely fake on the other end of the spectrum.
So, do some reasearch, and tell me what you guys think? I think anything that was in the space between the Earth and the Moon would have looked like swiss cheese in short order. I also think the radiation once you get outside of the Earth's gravity/magnetic field protection would fry you unless you have thousands of pounds of shielding protecting you from it.
NASA says they shielded the spacecraft with thin mylar and foil sheets.
They built the space vehicles out of thin alluminum panels with no armor at all.
Funny, but NASA really does not want to talk about the photos... LOL
Low orbit travel is easy. Your still in the upper reaches of the atmosphere, and your completely inside the magnetic field that protects us from the nasty radiation from the sun for the most part.
Discuss
*(Joel is now saying that space flight will be a popular tourist attraction in the near future, just as soon as we get the hydrogen/water thingy all worked out.)* LOL
Ok, here is the science.
First the radiation from the sun is very intense, and it's deadly. (What you can't see will kill you actually.) There are x rays and gamma rays, and other forms of particle emmisions that will kill human life in short order.
This radiation is more intense than what a nucular reactor produces, and it takes many layers of lead and other materials to shield the operators of these reactors.
Second, space is full of micro meteorites traveling at super velocities. (Just look at the moon some time, and you can see where they are hitting all the time.) The larger ones you might be able to avoid, but the microscopic ones are just as deady to anything that is not armored with an atmosphere, or tank thick resistance. (Spell that heavy armor, or miles of ever thickening gases.)
Third, many of the photos and film footage from the "moon" are so completely bogus it's not even funny. Simple things like running them at the correct frame rate solves the slow motion "1/3" gravity effect. Also many of the scale grids you see on the lunar photos have errors in them. (Missing, or out of scale, and clearly this was before photoshop, so they are doctored the old way on film, and the ones that did it, while amazing, were not perfect, and errors can be found if you know where to look.)
Ok, the last element is the background... Nobody for years noticed that the sets used on each "lunar mission" were not changed... They are ALL the same. If you take photos supposed to be from one mission and compare them to others, the background is the same in many of them. (Ones where you can see the outlines that is.) Some details have changed, like rock placement and such, but the "hills" are the same down to every detail and shape... Weird at the least, and smacks of being completely fake on the other end of the spectrum.
So, do some reasearch, and tell me what you guys think? I think anything that was in the space between the Earth and the Moon would have looked like swiss cheese in short order. I also think the radiation once you get outside of the Earth's gravity/magnetic field protection would fry you unless you have thousands of pounds of shielding protecting you from it.
NASA says they shielded the spacecraft with thin mylar and foil sheets.
They built the space vehicles out of thin alluminum panels with no armor at all.
Funny, but NASA really does not want to talk about the photos... LOL
Low orbit travel is easy. Your still in the upper reaches of the atmosphere, and your completely inside the magnetic field that protects us from the nasty radiation from the sun for the most part.
Discuss
