Just went out and measured my ACT and a Stock PP to make sure!
Both have 2.8mm diaphragms so unless ACT have found a way of making the PP heavy duty that uses a stock diaphragm I stick by what I said.
(I built Clutches for a living for a year when I was a kid way back)
Pioneer: To me it looked the other way round!
The PP diaphragm measured stock and the disc is quite a bit different with bonded linings with no Marcels.
(I bought mine 2 years ago so it could very well have changed)
Stokless: I used the ACT Street kit in my last build and it was fine! (The PP doesn't appear to be anything special my guess is a stock one with yellow paint)
The Disc will chatter slightly under certain conditions as it doesn't have Marcels but should hold your power goals.
LOL nah I'm lucky I work alone and don't have to deal with that sort of crap ;)
I used the gold omniviews many many years ago and used to love em till I got my first Speedie!
Ramble away Miggles!! :)
I did the same to my old SpeedGlas (one of their originals) so bought a new 9000X just before Christmas last year to replace it!
The tank is just about the only thing stopping me going dry sump!
If you mount it in the Hatch they're noisy as buggery so for a road car not good! (Before the peanut gallery jumps in with crap about standard road cars with dry sumps save it they're NOT running after market scavenge pumps)...
Allan: Don't know if you can get the depth needed (tanks are usually long and thin to seperate the air from the oil that the scavenge stages suck in)
<edit> Might work if you cut a hole where the battery tray is and made the tank to hang through!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.