Radial aircraft Conrods

IJ.

Grumpy Old Man
Mar 30, 2005
38,728
0
0
61
I come from a land down under
M5%20crankshaft%20assembly.JPG
 

IJ.

Grumpy Old Man
Mar 30, 2005
38,728
0
0
61
I come from a land down under
It's just the crank and conrod from an aircraft motor we were discussing it in another thread.

They use a master rod and the rest are connected to that.

The cylinders are in a circle around the crankcase.

400px-Pratt-Whitney_R-2800.jpg
 

Quin

Trans killer
Dec 5, 2006
1,989
0
36
33
Columbus, IN
D34DC311;877406 said:
Cool looking, functional? Not so much.

Aren't airplane motors usual damn powerful? And bikes weigh almost nothing? Shouldn't that bike be fast, following that logic? I could be wrong, but I distinctly remember reading several examples of airplane motors having ~1000hp
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,224
16
38
49
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
Quin;877500 said:
Aren't airplane motors usual damn powerful? And bikes weigh almost nothing? Shouldn't that bike be fast, following that logic? I could be wrong, but I distinctly remember reading several examples of airplane motors having ~1000hp


no

they are not high spinning engines. What they are is chuck full of Torque.
 

SupraMario

I think it was the google
Mar 30, 2005
3,467
6
38
38
The Farm
figgie;877605 said:
well no :)

you still ahve to control the power somehow. Remember, the boke will want to stay put. At high TQ values at low rpm equals bike flipping made easy. ;)

My post stands as it is. functional is a -1.:biglaugh:
 

TurboWarrior

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
763
0
0
41
Canada
After looking at how the engine works. A misfire or a dead cylinder would be death would it not? I don't see how it could keep moving with even 1 dead cylinder.