Search results

This is a supra forum, in the tech section, it's implied...

Basicly doing the bypass for the throttlebody and ISC? Loop the line, don't cap it.

Good way to make sure you have a suspension failure :icon_roll Torque specs are there for a reason.

Usually burning through between cylinders takes a bit more than that...

Depends, as it needs to be running EGR for starters...

Yep, not saying it's not worthwhile, but it depends on your goals. Much like cams on a stock car are a waste of money.

Blew between 4 and 5 so not going to be the issue... To the OP: Did you use the stock headbolts? Did it blow between the cylinders (sounds like that's what you're describing)? What other mods (turbo, boost, ect)? For what it's worth if it was stock everything and the stock headbolt...

Did the 89 have ABS brakes?

Not supposed to have a washer (by the EPC)

Unless you're going for broke for a crazy car, money is better spent elsewhere... It's not dangerous as if you're spending that much on the kit you're going to take the time to get everything balanced far better than a stock motor.

I'm going to be nice and say this. Will the H4 rebased HID's work good with E-code housings? Yes, they glare less than a good rewire normal halogen with DOT housings. BUT The chinese rebased HID kits are GARBAGE. The ballasts are shit, the controller is shit, the actuators are shit, and...

Doubt it as the head work alone is most of that...

Probably cheaper through a dealer since they have to make a profit margin...

Depends on the place. Machining takes time and if they're busy it's going to take more time.

400 is cake with an LS1, the most invasive change is the cam.

They'd have to be pressed out, if they're not welded in (they might be)

white isn't as noticable...

And I go right back to the point that the doors are stress members on a targa car.

The torque is from the smaller cam and faster spooling turboes (VVTI excluded). The VVTI will show a better curve because that's what VVTI was developed to do ;)