Search results

I would also like to try doing the crystal mod. Has anyone compared the electronics in the 87-88 ECU's with the 89-92 ECU's? Just wondering what different components are causing the early ECU's to hit the rev limiter later.

What's wrong with the T66?

/\ You know, the narrow minded individuals that think the only way to make power without spending tons of money is by swapping in a 2JZ. Nevermind, I should have never made that comment since it might start a 10 page argument. I'm just very glad guys like Milburn are pushing the limits of the...

"My rail wieght is around 2000lbs and I am a prove that what the 2jz do the 7M Could do it..." You will have a hard time convincing the ricers on here.

I know James Daily was running low 10's at around 139mph in MD a while back. This was on a 5sp tranny. I can't remember his exact time or mods. I think he had a 71mm turbo with a nice shot of N20. I was at his shop not too long ago. He know has an EVO with so much power that can't make a...

Good job. .What was your speed? I thought you were running a 67mm turbo?

Nice.. Sounds like a jet. I can't wait for high boost.

The pedal effort is not bad, and its held the power. So I can't complain too much. Its just not as smooth as some other clutches.

I'm using the ACT pressure plate with my Bronse. Zazzn, thats interesting that the full face would not hold the power. I'm surprised.. I guess the Feramic puck style is the way to go.

I have the Bronse and it will probably hold anything you will throw at it. But as far as being street friendly, I wouild have to give it a C. Even after all the break-in procedures, its still a harsh and somewhat chattery clutch. The Feramic full face should be much smoother$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

I was running 24psi and C16. But you should also know that my head was lifting very badly at the time. My temperature gauge was past the H when I crossed the finish line. I later found out my head was badly warped. And then a while later I found that I had low compression in #4 cylinder. So...

Thanks for the info Turbogate. I haven't heard to many people comment on how the RonR. longrunner manifold performs. I just can't ditch my AC.

1.15 turbine A/R. I guess since its a T3, it won't spool as bad as if it was a T4 with a 1.15 A/R. Still, it looks like it will be laggy without much top-end power. I just don't understand why no one listen's.. The turbo and its sizing are going to effect More Than Anything how your engine...

12.4 at 119mph. Its definantly capable of more.

Does anyone know what Toyota did to the ECU in the 89-92 supras to make them hit the rev limit earlier??

With an upgraded CT-26 and about 20psi of boost, high 12 second 1/4 mile times shouldn't be a problem. With drag radials and an aftermarket clutch, you could probably do low 12's.

I'm interested, but what I would like to see before purchasing this would be: 1. flow #'s 2. Better pics (I know there coming) 3. Alternator bracket Also, you never said if it was possible to keep the AC with this design?

This guy proved many theories to be wrong when it comes to the 7M making power. It doesn't say, but I believe he running a stock throttle body and stock intake manifold: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=78742&highlight=eric+varah

Good choice Suprastic.. Ive owned and driven many cars, and the MK3 supra has so much more character. Now take your time modding, and don't get over your head with too many expensive speed mods. Good luck..

Good luck on your decision. I actually chose an MK3 because I hated the looks of the MK4 so much. Not to mention that the MK4 is (and was) selling for about $12,000 dollars more than what they're worth IMO.