Having troubles starting.

rs4rush

New Member
Jan 25, 2007
701
0
0
Kirkland, Wa
So I just recently bought this car and it had a rebuild on a 91 7mgte and I have done every right step for the break in process to be complete. I know the rings have set and everything has worked fine! Starts up great, Pulls great(PS: I have not been driving the car hard), runs great nothing weird has happened except for yesterday(Friday). So I started it at school and it ran fine, I warmed it up and then just drove normally tell I got home. Then let it sit for about five minutes at my house then pulled it in the garage. Then later that night probably five hours later I went to start it and it wouldn't start, it cranks over but wont start. Its getting spark, the battery is fine, fuses are good, I looked for electrical wires that were loose(none what so ever). But everything seems to be working its getting gas, alternator is working. Starter is working. I just don't know what to do? So this morning I went out looked at my spark plugs... they're fine. And a few other things that I thought of and then hugged my car and then went to start it and after about two seconds it fired up( a bit rough tho)! So I let it idle and it was a very rough idle so I turned on the heat which makes the idle go up higher so it wouldn't die. Let it sit for about 10min then took it for a test drive around the block everything ran fine then shut her off. then tried 10 min later it fired up but its just running funny. It drives fine, seems to pull just fine. I am stumped I just want my baby to be healthy. Oh and I just changed the oil two days ago with 20w 50. And I am thinking about taking it to Toyota which is down the street to get a tune up. And then next Friday I am taking it up to my family's shop and where going to adjust the valves etc etc. Its their anything your guys can think off that I could do. Sorry for the novel I just figured I would try and include as much info as needed. Lemme know if there is anything else I could do.


Oh PS: No smoke out the tail pipe, no funny noises, no funny smells.
 
Last edited:

jdub

Official SM Expert: Motor Oil, Lubricants & Fil
SM Expert
Feb 10, 2006
10,730
1
38
Valley of the Sun
rs4rush said:
Oh and I just changed the oil two days ago with 20w 50.


kylefoto said:
cha! I'm running 20w-50 in my 20r in my corona. That shits like as thick as diff oil hahaha.


:3d_frown:

You guys are not doing your motor any favors...just how well do you think the "thick as shit" oil is going to flow through your bearings? Not very well...running 20W-50 is a great way to increase wear, increase bearing heat, and delay oil flow up to your cams. Why do you think your oil pressure is so high with that weight oil...it's resistance to flow. Suggest you guys re-think why you're using such a thick oil.
 

Jaguar_5

It's ALIVE!
Feb 7, 2006
1,468
0
0
Seattle
How many miles since the rebuild? Don't jump the gun on switching to a synthetic

20w50 is WAAAAAY too thick for a old engine, let alone a a fresh rebuild!
Go with a 5w30, or even 0w30

If the person that rebuild the engine told you to use 20w50, i would be nervous, very very nervous

Check for codes (just because the engine light is off doesn't mean no codes are stored)
 

rs4rush

New Member
Jan 25, 2007
701
0
0
Kirkland, Wa
And nothing has come up at all! No engine light nothing. My start problem was from a vacuum hose being unpluged. Anyway what should I do then change the oil today with somthing differnt?


And my oil pressure isnt high?
 
Last edited:

Nick M

Black Rifles Matter
Sep 9, 2005
8,898
40
48
U.S.
www.ebay.com
You think Toyota recomends 10W-30 pecause Exxon paid them? 5W-30 is also fine, especially in colder climates. Nothing like reinventing the wheel every week.
 
Last edited:

kylefoto

I am not ASIAN!
May 7, 2006
1,674
0
36
37
Lynnwood, WA
www.myspace.com
jdub said:
:3d_frown:

You guys are not doing your motor any favors...just how well do you think the "thick as shit" oil is going to flow through your bearings? Not very well...running 20W-50 is a great way to increase wear, increase bearing heat, and delay oil flow up to your cams. Why do you think your oil pressure is so high with that weight oil...it's resistance to flow. Suggest you guys re-think why you're using such a thick oil.
Thanks for the info john.
I'm not too knowledgable when it comes to oil and how it works.
 

IHI-RHC7

"The Boss"
Apr 1, 2005
1,310
0
0
41
Oregon
Sorry Cory,
I've been in Texas for the last week and haven't had access to a computer.
Guys, Heidi and I have run 50 weight oil since the beginning, and we have good reasons for it. I recommended that he choose an oil anywhere from 0W-50 to 20W-50. I agree that 20 is too thick for a cold engine, but with the amount of bearing failures that I have seen due to insufficient oiling in the rod bearings, I stick with 50 on the hot side to keep hot idle pressure a little higher that I've seen with 30 and 40 weight oil.
This engine was assembled with perfect toyota tolerances, and the oil was recommended based on our experience with these engines. I've also talked a lot with turbo builders and they agree that a thicker synth oil will add to the turbo's life.
Case in point: We've been running over 20 psi on Heidi's stock CT-26 for several years, and there is no axial play and the radial play has not increased since we raised the boost over stock levels. Sorry, it didn't exlode as soon as we ran more than 15 psi like everyone said it would, and it still made more power when we cranked up the boost.
Jaguar 5 said:
If the person that rebuild the engine told you to use 20w50, i would be nervous, very very nervous
This was not a sloppy rebuild and I didn't tell him to run "thick as shit" oil to cover up loose tolerances. Again, I've done my homework, and I recommended this oil from experience. I'm no oil expert, but I've been told by a few people on this site that I'm no idiot either. I'm certainly not some shady engine builder trying to screw someone over.
Jdub said:
You guys are not doing your motor any favors...just how well do you think the "thick as shit" oil is going to flow through your bearings? Not very well...running 20W-50 is a great way to increase wear, increase bearing heat, and delay oil flow up to your cams. Why do you think your oil pressure is so high with that weight oil...it's resistance to flow. Suggest you guys re-think why you're using such a thick oil.
J, You know your shit, and I'm not going to get into a shouting match with you over this, but 20W-50 isn't going to wear out the bearings. I told Cory to run which ever he could find of either 0, 5, 10, 15, or 20W-50. It just so happens that 20W-50 was the only one he could find, and I told him it would be fine. I'm counting on that resistance to flow to keep the oil in the bearing. The 7m has an oil relief hole in the rod, which helps lubricate the cylinder walls in most engines. The 7mgte also has piston oil squirters which do a better job of lubricating the cylinder walls. When you have both of these in one engine, along with 7 main bearings, 6 rod bearings, 14 cam bearings, 2 auxilliary shaft bearings and an oil hungry turbo charger, I'm not convinced by oil data that I should run the same oil we run in our accord in an engine that we push to the limits. I've found from looking inside engines that we have ran hard, that 50 weight supports the rod bearing under load much better than 30 or 40 weight can. The resistance to flow keeps the oil from flowing out the relief hole and keeps the bearing from getting hammered. Sure, the oil pressure will be roughly 5 psi higher at a hot idle with 50 weight in there, but I'm am not convinced that the oil temps are any higher. And I've seen no evidence that the cams suffer from delay of oil flow. On the contrary, I've seen less scoring and coking in the heads of cars that have ran 50 weight compared to those that have ran thinner oil.
It seems like everyone has a different opinion about what oil to use, however my opinion comes from the experience of rebuilding many 7ms for many customers. It's the added oil consumption and long stroke of these engines along with careful studying of actual engines that have seen varying levels of performance demands that has lead to my recommendation of using a thicker oil than 5W-30.
 

jdub

Official SM Expert: Motor Oil, Lubricants & Fil
SM Expert
Feb 10, 2006
10,730
1
38
Valley of the Sun
No shouting coming from this end Jake, but all I was able to glean from your post was opinion. Nothing about bearing design, oil boundary layer, oil film thickness, or the oil's additional duty of removing heat...especially from the bearings. It's a very common opinion...been around for a long time. But to be honest, I have seen nothing from all the things I've read that support using a heavy weight oil on a motor with tight bearing clearances. I have seen that gas mileage will drop, bearing wear does increase (especially on cold start), and oil temps increase due to reduced flow through the cooler. Suggested reading:
http://63.240.161.99/motoroil/

Went through all this in this thread...start at post #29
http://www.supramania.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31789&page=2

Read these posts in particular:
http://www.supramania.com/forums/showpost.php?p=428308&postcount=29
http://www.supramania.com/forums/showpost.php?p=429568&postcount=31
http://www.supramania.com/forums/showpost.php?p=430475&postcount=44
http://www.supramania.com/forums/showpost.php?p=441206&postcount=58

I am very much aware of how the 7M oil system works...if you had said that you opened the bearing clearances up to the high (loose) side of spec, I would more understand the need for a heavier weight oil. That would allow the oil to flow better without as much resistance than you would see with the spec in the middle or tight side. And, a heavier weight oil will significantly increase oil pressure...more than 5 psi....especially cold. Do this: take a bottle of any 50W multigrade oil and a bottle of 5W-30 oil and put it in the freezer for an hour or so. Then pour them on a 12-18" metal pan at a 30 deg angle side by side...wanna bet which one gets to the bottom of the incline 1st? That's how well the oil is going to flow in the motor. Saying that this resistance is going to keep the "bearings from getting hammered" does not reflect how an open bearing actually works. Suggested reading...specific attention to "hydrodynamic lubrication"...the regime in which a rod/main bearing operates:
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/2/7

About oil squirters...essentially they are nozzles. Think about what kind of liquid would provide the best spray pattern...high viscosity or low viscosity? Would you rather have a spray or a stream in this application?

Concerning cam bearings...the oil is going to drain from the top of the motor. Gravity is going to make that happen...keep in mind at engine shut down the oil is hot and is going to flow regardless of grade (the same is going to happen in the rod bearings too). Would you prefer to have oil get back up to the cam bearings quickly? Or take longer due to the resistance a thicker viscosity will experience going down the small diameter channel in the center of the cam?

One other point...any quality oil, especially a synthetic, will not cause deposits in the motor or coaking in the turbo. The weight is irrelevant....a lighter weight oil will work as well (or better) in this regard. The turbo needs both lubrication and efficient removal of heat...particularly on a turbo that's oil cooled only. Lubrication wise, the turbo is harder on an oil due to the heat produced...that's why you want it replenished as quickly as possible...again, flow through the turbo is what you want.

I'm not discounting your experience...in fact, experience and knowledge is a very powerful combination. Consider if you were using a 5W-30 with the same results what your response would be? That is my point about the ?W-50 vs. ?W-30 debate...why did you start using the oil that you do? Is it based on hearsay from long ago, and seems to work? Perhaps there are reasons for using something different...you have to dig to uncover it.
 

Jaguar_5

It's ALIVE!
Feb 7, 2006
1,468
0
0
Seattle
IHI-RHC7 said:
This was not a sloppy rebuild and I didn't tell him to run "thick as shit" oil to cover up loose tolerances. Again, I've done my homework, and I recommended this oil from experience. I'm no oil expert, but I've been told by a few people on this site that I'm no idiot either. I'm certainly not some shady engine builder trying to screw someone over.

Did not know who rebuilt the engine, So I do take back being nervous about the rebuild! Glad to hear for rs4rush's sake that it was a proper build from what it sounds like, and I do hope to see the car in person one day, as a local guy :)

You're certainly no idiot, I will be first to admit you surely have more experience than I do, but even geniuses can have misconceptions!

I still stick with the rest of my statement, but ultimately Jdub has this one covered, as I think it's fair to say that he is a oil expert, and to heed his advice!
 

rs4rush

New Member
Jan 25, 2007
701
0
0
Kirkland, Wa
Ya everything is fine! I can run this for another thousand miles then comes the red line synthetic! And Jaguar 5 I hope we can have a big seattle meet soon I am very exited about joining the local community. We should all have a photoshoot!
 

IHI-RHC7

"The Boss"
Apr 1, 2005
1,310
0
0
41
Oregon
Jdub said:
No shouting coming from this end Jake, but all I was able to glean from your post was opinion. Nothing about bearing design, oil boundary layer, oil film thickness, or the oil's additional duty of removing heat...especially from the bearings. It's a very common opinion...been around for a long time. But to be honest, I have seen nothing from all the things I've read that support using a heavy weight oil on a motor with tight bearing clearances. I have seen that gas mileage will drop, bearing wear does increase (especially on cold start), and oil temps increase due to reduced flow through the cooler. Suggested reading:
http://63.240.161.99/motoroil/
Toyota calls for 20w-50 in all climates over 70 degrees farenheit. That comes right out of the toyota supra owners manual. Yesterday I did type opinion because I didn't have the proof in front of me and it is out of character for me to speak truth without the facts to back it. Don't believe me? Here it is, scanned from page 118:

I never said that 50 weight was to be used all year long, but with summer fast approaching, I thought it was appropriate to advise Cory to use the oil that Toyota recommends for such temperatures.

Also, the oil cooler circuit is based on pressure, not temp or flow. I'm sure you know this, but the oil cooler relief in the filter bracket bleeds pressure from the engine and sends it to the cooler to maintain 40 psi, thus, any pressure exceeding 40 psi will be sent to the cooler. Higher pressure would result in a greater amount of oil reaching the cooler. Oil temps would not increase in our oil cooler setup.

Here are some quotes from the link you sent me.
The gold standard is that all engines should have a pressure of 10 PSI for every 1,000 RPM of operation, not more, not less.
Ferrari recommends Helix Ultra Racing 10W-60 “for hot climate conditions racing type driving on tracks”.
A 0W-30 is always the better choice, always. The 0W-30 is not thinner.
What I gleaned from just 101 is that it is the 20 of 20w-50 that is the problem. Heidi and I race her supra and we build supras to live a similar life with hot temps and high revs.

Automotive engine manufacturers know these principals of motor oils. They know there is thinning or thickening that will occur. They take these things into account when they write that owners manual.

I agree now that ideally 20w-50 is way to thick on startup, but I'm not convinced that 10w-30 is the answer. I would say that 10w-50 or 0w-50 would be ideal for our climate.

There is a huge advantage of using the thinner, 10W-30 at startup where 90 percent of the engine wear occurs. At 75 F the thicker oil has a viscosity in the range of 250 cS while the thinner oil has a viscosity of 100 cS. The thicker stuff is 150 cS thicker. This is a very big difference. I am using the 20W-50 as my thicker oil example here.
Well, you have my attention. However, I'd like to see what 10W or 0W-50 is with a full synth at startup...

The best way to figure out what viscosity of oil you need is to drive the car in the conditions you will use. Then use the oil viscosity that gives you 10 PSI per 1,000 RPM under those circumstances. For some reason very few people are able to get this simple principal correct. I cannot explain further.
Experience! With a 30 weight oil, I have NOT been able to keep this rule in a supra when driving hard. Again, I now think the 20W-50 is way too thick on startup and I appreciate the literature. I do, however, believe that a full synthetic 0W-50 would be more suitable for a 7m than 10W-30. Most supras, actually all supras that I've come in contact with, have had suprisingly low oil pressure. Also, the oil relief to the oil cooler is 40 psi, so the engine never meets that rule over 4k RPM in stock trim.

Higher revving engines need thinner oils.

Well, the 7m is NOT a high revving engine, it is a long stroke torque engine. I'm sticking to my guns.

In all cases you need to try different weight oils and see what happens. Then choose the correct viscosity.

Again, this is what I've done.

A 30 weight oil should be thought of as having an absolute viscosity of 110 and a 50 weight oil has an absolute viscosity of 120

At operating temp, the 50 weight is only 9.1 percent thicker than a 30 weight oil. That is why the hot idle oil pressure is roughly 5 psi higher with the 20W-50, and not substantially higher as you argue. Cold start is another story.

I then started the engine to check for leaks. The multitude of mechanical engine noises that followed nearly broke my eardrums for about 10 long seconds. Then it was suddenly very quiet. You could hear a pin drop. There was certainly the most possible amount of surface oil on all the internal parts as the engine was only off for an hour. But it was not until the oil circuit primed, filled then sent flow into all the parts that any lubrication was occurring

To a 575 maranello none the less... Are you sure we can trust this guy?:icon_razz
Jdub said:
I am very much aware of how the 7M oil system works...if you had said that you opened the bearing clearances up to the high (loose) side of spec, I would more understand the need for a heavier weight oil. That would allow the oil to flow better without as much resistance than you would see with the spec in the middle or tight side. And, a heavier weight oil will significantly increase oil pressure...more than 5 psi....especially cold. Do this: take a bottle of any 50W multigrade oil and a bottle of 5W-30 oil and put it in the freezer for an hour or so. Then pour them on a 12-18" metal pan at a 30 deg angle side by side...wanna bet which one gets to the bottom of the incline 1st? That's how well the oil is going to flow in the motor. Saying that this resistance is going to keep the "bearings from getting hammered" does not reflect how an open bearing actually works. Suggested reading...specific attention to "hydrodynamic lubrication"...the regime in which a rod/main bearing operates:
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/2/7

More quotes from your links
Engine bearings and the piston mostly operate in the "hydrodynamic lubrication" region, where a thick film separates the moving metal surfaces so that there is no chance of them coming into contact.
"...If you decrease the viscosity to a lighter oil, you increase flow at a loss of pressure. High flow helps to carry away more heat. High pressure helps to keep metal parts like the bearings out of contact with each other (scuffing).”

This is why I said, "I'm counting on that resistance to flow to keep the oil in the bearing." I know that my phrasing was incorrect, but I do understand this stuff, and higher pressure will help keep the bearing from getting hammered. It is not that a thicker oil is the answer for all applications, but as you said, a thin oil will freely spray from the relief hole, whilst a thicker oil will remain in the bearing cap and prevent scuffing. A better fix would be to remove the holes and run a thinner oil. We plan on doing exactly this on Heidi's engine.

Jdub said:
About oil squirters...essentially they are nozzles. Think about what kind of liquid would provide the best spray pattern...high viscosity or low viscosity? Would you rather have a spray or a stream in this application?
The viscosity difference is less than 10% at opperating temp, I doubt that the spray pattern would suffer.
Jdub said:
Concerning cam bearings...the oil is going to drain from the top of the motor. Gravity is going to make that happen...keep in mind at engine shut down the oil is hot and is going to flow regardless of grade (the same is going to happen in the rod bearings too). Would you prefer to have oil get back up to the cam bearings quickly? Or take longer due to the resistance a thicker viscosity will experience going down the small diameter channel in the center of the cam?
On cold start, it's the 20 that's the problem, not the 50. I've still yet to see numbers for 0W-50. I'd like to see the contrast from 0W-20 to 0W-50 on cold viscosity. I noticed that 5W-50 is 210 to 0W-30's 154, ~ 36% thicker at cold start. Well, make that at warm start: 40 C.
Jdub said:
One other point...any quality oil, especially a synthetic, will not cause deposits in the motor or coaking in the turbo. The weight is irrelevant....a lighter weight oil will work as well (or better) in this regard. The turbo needs both lubrication and efficient removal of heat...particularly on a turbo that's oil cooled only. Lubrication wise, the turbo is harder on an oil due to the heat produced...that's why you want it replenished as quickly as possible...again, flow through the turbo is what you want.
I won't argue with you here. However, I've shared many long winded conversations with a few local turbo rebuilders and their general agreement is that a thicker oil will help stabilize the shaft at higher speeds, over 150K rpm. I'm sure your right that it's the synthetic part of our experience and not the weight differences that explains the lack of coaking on the turbo bearings and camshaft surfaces.
Jdub said:
I'm not discounting your experience...in fact, experience and knowledge is a very powerful combination. Consider if you were using a 5W-30 with the same results what your response would be? That is my point about the ?W-50 vs. ?W-30 debate...why did you start using the oil that you do? Is it based on hearsay from long ago, and seems to work? Perhaps there are reasons for using something different...you have to dig to uncover it.

Yes there are reasons why we started using 20W50, and I didn't have to dig deep to uncover them. In fact, I only had to dig 118 pages into the owners manual that ALL supras were equipped with to find our reason.

If you have absorbed and digested the information here you should be able to pick out the proper operating oil weight for your car, be it a 30, 40, 50 or even 20 weight oil
Yes, and that is exactly what we've done. With that said, we will certainly try using a slightly thinner oil, like 0W-50 (if we can find it), but there's no way in hell that 5W-30 is making it into our supra's oil pan during the summer months. In fact, we could run 15W-40 during even the coldest oregon winters according to toyota.

Thanks for the info, it was a very good read.
-Jake
 
Last edited: