300hp

Supraboy89

New Member
Oct 25, 2006
357
0
0
Hampton GA
I was just wondering because some of you guys are putting down more HP than my car with the stock shit. And i have a good bit of mods and only have 60000mi on my new motor and my turbo is in good shape to. my running gear is good also
 

KeithH

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
1,716
0
0
Portland, OR
12% loss for the 5 speed? WOW! My engine must be very tired (186,000 miles).

5 Speed
Stock Turbo
Engine has never been touched except a retorque
HKS DP
HKS 75mm Turbo Exhaust
K&N FIPK
GReddy Type S BOV
Magnecore plug wires
HKS Manual Boost Controller set just below fuel cut

When I dyno'd I hit 209 at the wheels.

232 - 12% is 204.16. I've picked up a whole 4.84whp out of all of those changes.

Remember that 232 is the best case scenario. You will want to strap that baby down on a dyno before making your changes to find out what your actual improvement is. Get a baseline.
 

shaeff

Kurt is FTMFW x2!!!!
Staff member
Super Moderator
Mar 30, 2005
10,588
9
38
Around
i hit 289rwhp, 295rwtq on a mustang dyno, stock CT spiking to 15psi, and dropping off to about 12ish psi by redline.

mods in profile.

-shaeff
 

stratoayu

New Member
May 13, 2005
435
0
0
surrey
309 rwhp 345rwtq mid summer dyno OUTSIDE, 11 psi tapering to 9~10. 3" from turbo back, stock trim ct26, stock intercooler, hardpipes, cone filter... 94 octane... stock fuel
 

Supraboy89

New Member
Oct 25, 2006
357
0
0
Hampton GA
stratoayu said:
309 rwhp 345rwtq mid summer dyno OUTSIDE, 11 psi tapering to 9~10. 3" from turbo back, stock trim ct26, stock intercooler, hardpipes, cone filter... 94 octane... stock fuel

how the hell did you do that.
 

89Turbo

New Member
Oct 22, 2005
804
0
0
Portland
KeithH said:
12% loss for the 5 speed? WOW! My engine must be very tired (186,000 miles).

5 Speed
Stock Turbo
Engine has never been touched except a retorque
HKS DP
HKS 75mm Turbo Exhaust
K&N FIPK
GReddy Type S BOV
Magnecore plug wires
HKS Manual Boost Controller set just below fuel cut

When I dyno'd I hit 209 at the wheels.

232 - 12% is 204.16. I've picked up a whole 4.84whp out of all of those changes.

Remember that 232 is the best case scenario. You will want to strap that baby down on a dyno before making your changes to find out what your actual improvement is. Get a baseline.


no offense but thats horrible, i would most definetly say bad dyno.
 

KeithH

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
1,716
0
0
Portland, OR
89Turbo said:
no offense but thats horrible, i would most definetly say bad dyno.

No offense taken. Actually I ran on two different dynos - one in Vegas and one in Portland (both dynojets) and they were very close.

What I am trying to say is that your engine may be tired so get a baseline before doing any mods to see how healthy your engine is before starting down the long road.
 

89Turbo

New Member
Oct 22, 2005
804
0
0
Portland
KeithH said:
No offense taken. Actually I ran on two different dynos - one in Vegas and one in Portland (both dynojets) and they were very close.

What I am trying to say is that your engine may be tired so get a baseline before doing any mods to see how healthy your engine is before starting down the long road.


where at in Portland?
 

89Turbo

New Member
Oct 22, 2005
804
0
0
Portland
KeithH said:
TorqueFreaks. Maybe I'll hit up RRev sometime this year - if I get the car back together.


hey man if ya ever need a hand gettin it back together you know how to get ahold of me.
 

MKThree

New Member
Sep 12, 2006
3
0
0
St. Pete, FL
301 hp
305 lb ft @ 102.54 ambient air temp!

spike to 12 and steady at 10 lbs of boost, stock turbo, jdm engine with valve job, mods in profile.