Search results

I agree with Jeff.

^do you have AIM?? If so, you can instant message the owner of CS, his IM name is MichaelAMalloy and he's online right now hope that helps ya

I make a Mk3 calendar, the ONLY one :) http://www.cafepress.com/thesupragoddess/2135673

This is honestly my fault, not TurboLovers or anyone elses. I was overhwelmed by the reponses to this as the idea quite obviously flourished very quickly, and her reply PM back to me was that she needed time to think about it, and I obviously forgot about her, dohh If Meggs wants to give up...

Ohhhh boy... it was my fault because I was swamped with PMs and I forgot to add TurboLover because she wanted a few days to decide. My fault.... I dont want there to be any issues, or a flame war about who has more presedence to be in it or not... Im just going to step away from this...

dump asses?

Yeah :( We had a couple of girls waiting in line who had already agreed, and since I didnt get a reply at all from you, I figured you didn't want to be in it. There's always next time, and it may be better to wait til next time as this is pretty much the "trial and error" 1st year, lol

Well the way I picture it is, if you want skimpy or near non existant clothed girls, there's plenty of other calendars out their that cater to this, albeit they don't feature Mk3 Supras :) I am not doing this so I can get a huge profit for myself, because that simply won't happen... I am...

Well it looks like you won't be buying one then. These girls don't want to be in a swimsuit calendar, it's either this way or nothing at all *shrug*

repost for the 3rd time in like a week

lies!

no idea, a few newpeople have registered in the past few days, so cs.com isn't broken, at least not for everyone...

haha, people are going to think I talk dirty or something

Congrats!!! :)

GTFO unless you have boobies :biglaugh:

dear Lord, dont bring up the 5M head vs 7M head flow debate, hahaha! That has been going on for many years now, heated arguments on both sides and it's really rather redundant I'd guess. The 5M is quite a capable engine regardless of it's old and out of date design, but I do agree the head...

oh my goodness guys, major confusion here. ok.... some 5MGE background real quick 1982 145hp 150ft/lbs (8.8:1 pistons) 1983 150hp 159ft/lbs (8.8:1 pistons) 1984 automatic cars kept the 83 engine, (8.8:1 pistons) manuals got 160hp 163 ft/lb version (9.2:1 pistons) 1985-86 161hp 169...

lol, I dunno... i thought it was supposed to be a giant crying emo smiley