Search results

Wow man that's quite some math you did there, still haven't got a clue how you got your results :aigo: :biglaugh: . Doesn't the i/c core size has to do with lag as well as the actual i/c piping length? Come on Ian, quit lurking!

Justin that's just dye, he didn't burn that thumb, he's just showing off those "ninja" hands again...:biglaugh: :-p

Ok the turbos outlet ID is 35 or 38mm x 2, I'm not sure as I don't have the turbos here and it's been a while since I last checked them. These two are connected to a two in one pipe that has two 50mm ID legs to a 74mm ID pipe to the intercooler, the core I think is 600x300x100mm (~23.5"x12"x4")...

Steve what kind of lag do you expect with that size of intercooler and the wide i/c piping? I was checking your i/c and it obviously has some serious air capacity. Needless to say that we have totally different setups, I was thinking about that regarding my i/c and piping and I have some serious...

Not throwing stars and daggers from inside your supra, are you? I thought you'd need them hands for steering :evil2:

Ian I know... My point exactly :biglaugh:

God damn, Steve you got small hands man...:naughty: or is that turbosmart a bit on the godjilla size!

William I have both (the jdm 2-port currently on the engine) and actually I was wondering what the 3rd port on the usdm -and ukdm apparently- is for and if it offers any advantage? I was thinking of swapping if there is any benefit.

What happened to that Toyota rationale of over-engineering??? I thought that it was to be followed on this keychain also, that's what I'm used to when it comes down to my Supra anyway :biglaugh:

My question is that apart from the length x width dimensions why did it have to be so thin as well? It wouldn't hurt to be 2-3mm thick instead of 1mm. Do you not think that 1mm is extremely thin? I mean if you think of all the effort you put in this and had so many forum members motivated to buy...

Ok, I got mine today. I just want to be the devil's advocate here, not whining, hating, moaning or anything like that, just my personal, honest opinion. First of all props to Keith for organizing the whole gb as well and efficiently as he did, there's no doubt that he did a great job on that...

I begin to believe so :icon_eek: :icon_cry:

At least you're at the bottom of the world. I'm right in the middle and still Ian from oz beat me to it :icon_evil . Ian I can't believe how lucky you are man...

How do you mean? You mean keep your foot on the throttle when you start her up until it get's warm or set idle to higher rpm?

LOL :biglaugh: , that's interesting. How does your motor run without it and combined to the maft pro (if that would affect in any way)?

Does anyone happen to know the ISC valve pipe outer diameter for that breather filter to be mounted to? Is it 12 or 15mm? I know that the obvious thing to do would be to go and check my ISC valve but since my car is totally apart I'd have to dig up in tenths of bags and boxes in my garage in...

Well obviously you'd run the ISC output to a catch can when you're such a dork to mix it up with PCV :nuts: :crazy1: . Yeap that's me talking :bsflag: as I messed that one up big time.

Adam does that mean that the ISC piping would still be somehow necessary to be connected to the turbo's inlet even with the speed density setup? I thought that this could be binned for good. When you say a large breather, how do you mean compared to a Greddy cath can modified to have two inlets...

Hmm...I guess it has to do with the structural differences between the mkiii and mkii then. You see my intercooler is in no way bigger than yours :aigo: but it's still quite big, here's a clue: so basically the top is level with the top of the bumber where I mounted two brackets but the rear...

It's a serial connection. Here's the back of the unit: