Stock intercooler vs. aftermarket

Jimbo

Creeper
Jul 15, 2009
263
0
0
San Jose
I cracked my stock intercooler a while back and replaced it with an aftermarket one I had laying around. Its heavier and theres a bit more piping, couple extra brackets and clamps, and a lot more scraping on driveways so Im considering slapping a stock one back on.

But before I do I was wondering if theres any real benefit to having an aftermarket one when the only mods I have is an HKS BOV and a cone filter. The rest of the piping is stock.

Does it flow better, lag more because the air has to travel longer?
Or is stock fine when my goal is only about 350hp?
 
Jimbo;1812127 said:
I cracked my stock intercooler a while back and replaced it with an aftermarket one I had laying around. Its heavier and theres a bit more piping, couple extra brackets and clamps, and a lot more scraping on driveways so Im considering slapping a stock one back on.

But before I do I was wondering if theres any real benefit to having an aftermarket one when the only mods I have is an HKS BOV and a cone filter. The rest of the piping is stock.

Does it flow better, lag more because the air has to travel longer?
Or is stock fine when my goal is only about 350hp?

You'll gain a few HP from it.

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
 

shipkiller

Member
Sep 16, 2010
398
0
16
Quebec
the psi-drop loss is horrible on the stock IC.
you will see a pleasant difference on the buttdyno once you go with a decent aftermarket one
 

Nick M

Black Rifles Matter
Sep 9, 2005
8,873
37
48
U.S.
www.ebay.com
Turbo Magazine said:
The factory intercooler leaves little to be desired with regards to both pressure drop and cooling effectiveness. When we ran our first dyno tests on the Supra (TURBO Jan '87) we thought the restriction at higher boost pressures was actually in the turbo, but in conferring with Cartech, Spearco and HKS it was found that the stock intercooler itself was a major contributor to the problem. Testing at Cartech showed the stock intercooler to have a 3 psi pressure drop a 6.8 psi and a whopping 4.3 psi pressure drop at 9 psi. In other words, the turbo had to do the same work and therefore, produce heat as if it was run at 13.3 pounds of boost, while the engine itself was only seeing 9 pounds of boost.


All of these intercoolers are similar in size except that the Spearco unit also employs slightly larger diameter tubing in some locations going to and from the intercooler.


The only intercooler we were able do to an actual before and after test with on our own car was one of the units from Cartech. At stock boost pressure we found an 11-horsepower gain between the stock and Cartech intercooler. While this gain was actually measured at the stock (8 psi w/exhaust) boost pressure, it should be noted that intercooler efficiencies are best tested in a real world or street environment with actual air flow across the core. Previous testing on the Cartech intercooler showed a 7/10 psi drop at 6.8 psi and 1.10 psi at 14 psi which basically agreed with our dyno runs. In addition to actual pressure drop, Cartech testing of the intercooler showed 89% efficiency vs. 68% on the factory unit. With the similarity in intercooler upgrades, it would be safe to say that any one of these would be an almost mandatory option if you are starting to go for serious boost.
 

505turboman

New Member
Jul 14, 2009
69
0
0
Albuequerque, NM
That's an awesome link! Aftermarket is always better but don't forget even though aftermarket is better if your aftermarket inter cooler is too big you'll get psi drop by a pound or two
 

Poodles

I play with fire
Jul 22, 2006
16,757
0
0
42
Fort Worth, TX
Keep in mind the stock IC was one of the better ones of that time. Other factory turbo cars (if they had an intercooler) were very restrictive compared to ours.

That said, of course you can do better ;)