Cometic MHG reusable??

BJ91T

Member
Aug 28, 2006
810
0
16
Baton Rouge LA
Hello , well as some of you know by now my brand new motor is doing some things that need fixing. It has a cometic 2.0mm MHG (1,77mm) on it and has less than 300 miles on this rebuild, however i plan to have my stock rods resized and stress relived so naturally the head will need to come off. I am not sure if the cometic can be reused like the hks etc..... I have arp studs on this motor @100ft lbs.


Thanks In Advance
BJ
 

BJ91T

Member
Aug 28, 2006
810
0
16
Baton Rouge LA
thats due to tourqe wrench failure (it was reading wrong) when i checked them with a good wrench they were at 100 i had the bad wrench set to 85 :(
 

jdub

Official SM Expert: Motor Oil, Lubricants & Fil
SM Expert
Feb 10, 2006
10,730
1
38
Valley of the Sun
JAV is correct...80 ft/lbs is the spec for ARP studs using moly. The MHG will seal fine at that torque, even used.

Make sure you clean ALL the old Viton sealer...paint thinner or Acetone works well. Once clean, apply a coat of copper sealer to the MHG and let dry for 10 min or so...you only have to coat both exterior sides of the MHG. Carefully lay it on the block and install the head.
 

TurboWarrior

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
763
0
0
42
Canada
FYI to anyone considering a cometic gasket. Make sure you use a spray on sealant or whatever the forum recommends. I used a cometic gasket on my build and it leaks. Torqued to 88ft/lbs. Complete engine rebuild i did everything right. Oil passage leaks into the coolant compression seems ok. Im using an HKS this time.

Retorqued it after i noticed it was leaking to 95ft/lbs. It leaks less. But it still leaks.
 

starscream5000

Senior VIP Member
Aug 23, 2006
6,359
0
36
Hot and Humid, KY
I was referring to the OP with his torque of 100 ft/lbs with moly. That's 20 ft/lbs higher than the recommended figure. What's the cusion between the recomended value and the stress point? 25%?

Yours is right there with his though...

Research what the torque point is on the ARP's to where they will no longer be reliable and should be discarded.
 

TurboWarrior

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
763
0
0
42
Canada
I think you are right. ARP site says

"81ft/lbs torque based on 75% of strength"

ill make a call on that when i see them im running low on money. Really, I can't afford to be doing this twice. But then again i really can't afford to do it 3 times heh
 

starscream5000

Senior VIP Member
Aug 23, 2006
6,359
0
36
Hot and Humid, KY
That's 101.25 ft/lbs max rating with no give, not accounting for expansion of head and block when heated. The 81 ft/lbs is the old rating too IIRC, it's 80 now, so yep, 100 ft/lbs is the max. If I were the both of you, I'd get new ARP studs if both of those torque values are on ARP moly lube.
 

TurboWarrior

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
763
0
0
42
Canada
You're right its cutting it very close. Moly was used. Looks like ill be getting another set.

In these high torque ranges do you think the head may be deformed after only a summer of use? Is another machining nessecary?

I know too many questions
 

Idealsupra

Supramania Contributor
Mar 31, 2005
2,390
0
0
42
Orlando
www.tampabaysupras.com
TurboWarrior said:
FYI to anyone considering a cometic gasket. Make sure you use a spray on sealant or whatever the forum recommends. I used a cometic gasket on my build and it leaks. Torqued to 88ft/lbs. Complete engine rebuild i did everything right. Oil passage leaks into the coolant compression seems ok. Im using an HKS this time.

Retorqued it after i noticed it was leaking to 95ft/lbs. It leaks less. But it still leaks.

ummmm NO.