I wasn't referring to you. I was talking to matt. I just read his first post in the thread and realized he does it everywhere. Thought it was strange.
-Joe
^You don't sign your name like that
anyway. this thread is very interesting. I'll keep reading
Yes, 86.5 was the first year of the Supra =P
In Japan no car was called a Supra until the A70.
[flamesuit]
Mk3 is just a name we coined here in America ;) In reality its MK1 and MK2
I mostly meant the statement in rebuttle to those that say the 1J just doesn't have what it takes to move our big heavy cars when in reality it can hold it's own just fine.
We all know a 2J has the same number of pistons and the same bore as the 1J, just with .5L extra in the stroke. A 1J...
I've been reading most of your posts and threads about the 1j lately. I think you've really got the wrong idea about the motor as if you're falling victim to all the nay saying myths about the motor.
As far as having a built 1J. Very few stateside have built motors. Mostly for the reason...
theres t78 1Js. I don't see anything wrong with that or a t88.
One thing alot of people here in the states don't have that they could really use for their 1J is cams. the stock cams are gay for anything other than stock twins IMO.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.