At 144MPH trap, the car would be putting down over 800 RWHP ;)
The axles should hold, no idea why they wouldn't..? You need more than 800RWHP to run an 8 also. What 60foots is he pulling?
Duane
I've heard many 7M's that sound badass! Have you heard Nate's car at WOT on the limiter?!!! Pure sex! :naughty:
I would agree with you on that.
I'm glad I can motivate someone in wanting to keep this tree trunk pulling engine. :icon_bigg So thanks!
I was thinking in terms of engine only, nothing else.
. The late blocks of the 7M also has extra ribbing. (The late 91 and 92 blocks IIRC like the JZ engines.)
. Pistons better? I would need proof on that. They are not forged pistons like many think. (they are Hypereutectic which can have...
Yes I was on stock rods at the Streets of Willow track in Cali. ;) Surprised? Cause I'm not. The big track vs smaller tracks have many difference variances. It will also depend on how you drive the car. Many factors are looked at when driving a car for the track like gear ratio, turbo set-up...
The rods on the 7M vs 2J are almost identical. (other than one being longer) Where is your proof when stating things such as being "weak"?
Stock vs stock the JZ heads are better and is no question but as Ron and I both know, once they are fully done (ported, machined etc..) the differences are...
I know the history well. We are speaking of M as in 7M is what I am saying. The engine is different than 1965. You are making it sound like the engine was designed in 65 which is incorrect. :3d_frown:
Also as asked by IJ a couple of times, state the technological improvements from the 7m and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.