Search results

thats what i thought. how about engine design and such?

well im really interested in working on or around high performance engine. how is the job market on those?

fsae sound like alot of fun. how so i check which school has this program? i would really like to work in or around high performance cars and im use an engineerer is needed for those. but what branch pr mechanical? and for those whos a mech what branch and what do you guys do? what does...

well im not really to sure on what i want to do thats why im opening my options(thats why the question is very broad.) also i have thought about mechanical. BUT its a rather big one so any sub decipline in particular?

well im working on my engineering degree in college and was wondering what engineering jobs involve cars? i originally wanted to do aerospace but my real passion is cars. any ideas?

i think in the eyes of public any car with loud exhuast is public nuisance lol. to them full exhaust/open dp/just plain ol muffler sound all the same. out of topic. my rc51 has full exhaust. its only a slip on and this shit seems like its louder than a open dp supra lol. :evil2:

well with the cut out that i was thinking it would vent straight down. and to be honest i like the sound of open dp.

^^ doesnt that mean that a ddp would be a "bad" idea since it vents in the engine bay

did you go full 3" or just after the intercooler? and what size did you use after the turbo(if you used different size

is it 2.5" piping straight to the tb? or did you replace the "3000 pipe" with 2.75"?

so whats the difference bitween under the car test pipe/cutout. and straight vent? or is it the same hazard? so in point whats the point of electric cutout if its that risky? btw with the side vent wouldnt the passenger be suffering lol

what do you mean by complexity? it seems simple to me. maybe im missing something. i mean its the relative the same. piping from turbo >IC>piping to throttle body. BOV in bitween. ^^ the same. except now theres a cooler. so its heat exchanger > pump>ic>heat exchanger ^^right...

really? doesnt the car feel sluggish a bit? i had a 57 trim turbo(not a ct26) not to long ago and set boost at 18psi. it feels like a different car when its normal temp out than when its hot out. when its hot out its just not pulling as hard. on a stockish boost maybe it wont make much...

so there is no power gain with a 2.75 after the IC even on a sp61?

wait so i put it directly on the intake manifold? or could it be mounted on IC piping after the intercooler? to double check a hobbs switch is one that is pressured control switch right? and boost adjustable? how much psi can the hobbs switch handle?

im curious with your coment so with a sp61 you would benifit from having a 2.75" ic after the intercooler? would it be better to run 3" for a sp61 or would that be over kill?

what if it dumps directly under? so it wont hit anything but the ground under? i was planning on running a cutout that exit under.(ofcource its longer than 1') would it still be risky?

how did you do that? where did you connect it? i was under the impression that this setup is basically all on its own besides the power lines.

wait so the pump "pumps" faster under higher rpm?

does it ever get to a point where the liquid gets hot? after all it is constantly passing IC to cool down the hot air and combined with hot temps outside. and what liquid would best work for this set up? i was thinking coolant/water/water wetter?