Toyota's autos are better than most with their ECT, but it's still called a slush box for a reason...
Poodles;1134528 said:Toyota's autos are better than most with their ECT, but it's still called a slush box for a reason...
IJ.;1134477 said:Never driven a stock Auto, are they really that bad?
suprastanger507mgte;1134613 said:my experience......horrible IJ./QUOTE]
Horrible? Could you elaborate?
As compared to other stock auto's? Or/and do you mean a340's have poor build quality? bad electronics? No build potential.
To make a bold statement like the a340 is "horrible" without any explaination isn't very persuasive. It seems more like bashing. :kickinthenuts:
I agree that there are better transmissions for specific applications, but the a 340 is not a bad trans at all. The only reason I personally would ever consider a different trans for my Supra is because you can't build a trans brake into an a340. But like I said, that is strictly a specific application that most folks don't need/want.
webbs7mgte;1134556 said:well this whole thread turned into what we perfer or what we think of toyotas mastermind craftsmanship...but the 5spd swap isnt impossible chances are a supra owner is doing one right now lol....or swaping back to a auto...watever u do gl with it and let us know how it goes...start building that ma70 or jza70 whch ever one u have and lets see it rip