Found this on the forum tonight, havent seen it on here so....http://supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=102525&page=1&pp=25&highlight=N%2
Na cam dyno
- Thread starter Cya
- Start date
Nothing new there. Less duration and lift will promote spool on a small turbo like the CT26, but eventually choke it off. I didnt realize the GE cam, from what ever was tested, had less duration. I know the lift is lower, as the repair manual lists a spec.
I certainly wouldnt install a used cam from anywhere in a new engine, or something I was building.
I certainly wouldnt install a used cam from anywhere in a new engine, or something I was building.
Fuzz420
Are U Here 2 take My Baby
one of the only reasons apart from MHG and ARPs that I almost look forward to BHG or otherwise needing to pull the engine.
<yeah, too lazy to swap em while its in the car>
<yeah, too lazy to swap em while its in the car>
yea they are good for lower rpms (stock ct) as you see 5000+ the gte cams would start to make more power..
tissimo said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJVmk3
Well, i swapped to N/A cams today. I did 3 pulls on the dyno before the swap, swaped them, drove around the block a few times to get warmed up, and did three more pulls. attached is the chart. Red pull is stock turbo cams, blue is N/A cams. They speak for themselves.
Other way around dude.
