Sorry, I'm going to have to disagree with most of you.
If you have a properly functioning sequential system, I don't see any reason to ditch it... If I had to change a #2 turbo once or twice, well so be it. I would rather have the benefit of sequential. You will spool up and make power earlier from a dig. The ECU controls the sequential system. After the RPM where both turbos come online, they will stay that way unless you drop back below that RPM point(I believe it's around 3000?). So if you're racing from a dead stop, you will be able to make use of the sequential system to get out of the hole quicker, then it will be TTC after that. When you shift, you won't be respooling #1 and then #2 again but both in parallel. With the TTC mod, you are giving up that initial quick spool in the low end when it would actually be very helpful.
This is all assuming a properly functioning system... The problem is, there are a lot of cars with seq. systems that aren't working the way they're supposed to. Some experience problems like the 2nd turbo not coming online, not making adequate boost with #1, #2 not coming online until very late in the RPM range, not making full boost until very late in the RPM range, etc... Instead of diagnosing the problem which can take some time and is often tedious, they just take the easy out and ditch the whole system(which I can somewhat understand). Alot of them never had a properly functioning seq. system in the first place, so when they go TTC and does away with the problems they had before they say stuff like, "Man, TTC rocks! So much better than sequential." And everyone else that had a faulty seq. system and just went TTC puts their $.02 in and confirms how much better TTC is for them. If I had a dollar for every thread in the MKIV section on SF about a malfunctionic seq. system, well I'd have a lot of dollars...
TTC, all the lag of a single turbo with none of the power...