Those people who thought I was wrong about the 1jz and 2jz cranks....
- Thread starter siman
- Start date
- Status
You PM'd a warning, thats enough. Why make me a "poster guy" of the "bad member"...lol
Go ahead and lock the thread with the other ajoining thread in General Discussion.......
since these people cant stand to have a laugh here.... :ugh:
Go ahead and lock the thread with the other ajoining thread in General Discussion.......
since these people cant stand to have a laugh here.... :ugh:
Good info, just this post went to crud. I'll lock it, just to keep down tempers. I am not on anyones side here, I just want to try and keep peace here. :slap:
L
lanky189
Guest
This is not going to happen again. Both parties involved here will have PM from me shortly.
Shit..I go away for one night and Siman starts a bon fire in my section. Siman..one more outburst and consider your self banned from OFF Topic... do not question me on this.. I will not hesitate.
Shit..I go away for one night and Siman starts a bon fire in my section. Siman..one more outburst and consider your self banned from OFF Topic... do not question me on this.. I will not hesitate.
Dammit, I hate having to lay down the law. However, sometimes it is required.
Concentrate on the problem here, not the people involved, please.
Siman, I can see your reasoning - and I can see the flaw in it. You should go back and examine your logic until you can see the flaw in it. Here's a hint - the formula for displacement is very well known and does not include deck height for a very good reason.
IJ, I can understand your wish to get a couple free engines at Siman's expense - who wouldn't want a 1J & 2J for free?
Even so, if you must debate, please try to explain where the flaw in logic is, rather than resorting to flames, especially with Siman, who we all know has a very thin skin. No offense Siman, if you stop and think about it, you know it's true.
To everyone who wants to prove this one way or another, there is only one way that will be satisfactory to both sides - go measure the stroke on both cranks. I know what you will find, but I rather doubt that both sides will believe me if I throw it out here, so go find out for yourself.
In the meanwhile, let's agree to disagree, and leave this alone until someone has hard proof.
PS: Word from someone else is NOT hard proof. There is too much opportunity to misunderstand someone else's opinion as fact.
Concentrate on the problem here, not the people involved, please.
Siman, I can see your reasoning - and I can see the flaw in it. You should go back and examine your logic until you can see the flaw in it. Here's a hint - the formula for displacement is very well known and does not include deck height for a very good reason.
IJ, I can understand your wish to get a couple free engines at Siman's expense - who wouldn't want a 1J & 2J for free?
Even so, if you must debate, please try to explain where the flaw in logic is, rather than resorting to flames, especially with Siman, who we all know has a very thin skin. No offense Siman, if you stop and think about it, you know it's true.To everyone who wants to prove this one way or another, there is only one way that will be satisfactory to both sides - go measure the stroke on both cranks. I know what you will find, but I rather doubt that both sides will believe me if I throw it out here, so go find out for yourself.
In the meanwhile, let's agree to disagree, and leave this alone until someone has hard proof.
PS: Word from someone else is NOT hard proof. There is too much opportunity to misunderstand someone else's opinion as fact.
I apologise to anyone I offended but there is only so much I can take before I lose it!
If he'd taken me up on it I would have given the motors to a couple of the local guys in need as shipping them back here wouldn't have been an option and I wasn't paying for them!
I was fine right up till the PM's started!
It won't happen again.
If he'd taken me up on it I would have given the motors to a couple of the local guys in need as shipping them back here wouldn't have been an option and I wasn't paying for them!
I was fine right up till the PM's started!
It won't happen again.
1JZ: 71.5mm of stroke 86mm bore
2JZ: 86mm of stroke 86mm bore
86>71.5
stroke x bore = displacement
class dismissed
Here's the proof:
2JZ: 86mm of stroke 86mm bore
86>71.5
stroke x bore = displacement
class dismissed
Here's the proof:
Last edited:
L
lanky189
Guest
Shawndude said:
10th post........all he was lacking was the .pdf. Dammit if people could read, this all could've been avoided.
I didn't read this whole thread but anyone who says that longer rods with a taller deck will increase your displacement is sadly uninformed about the basics of engine design.
L
lanky189
Guest
oneandgone said:
he was/is banned for a week, as such certain parts of his profile etc will say that.
L
lanky189
Guest
- Status