My cars a street car. Like to drive it when available. Race gas is too much coin to run full time at 10+ a gallon. Not worth it at that point.
No head work or cams??
Nice numbers!!!
No head work or cams??
Nice numbers!!!
New dyno results: (627hp / 574tq) GT4088
- Thread starter MK3Brent
- Start date
nosechunks;1372331 said:
I pay $9 per gallon 116 octane, that's not that much considering.
No head work, stock cams.
What is the weak link on your IC pipes? Are you going to to vband, or do some of those pipe connectors?
560@21psi, No n02 or meth? or anything else? seems like really good numbers i didn't think that turbo flowed that well. Im looking for ~500 at around 20ish psi, i was thinking the gt4094 at minimum.
Maybe its the FFIM thats making the difference? Either way good stuff!!!
Maybe its the FFIM thats making the difference? Either way good stuff!!!
The weak link in my IC pipes are that they're not bead rolled and my one motor mount shot. When the engine torques up, the pipes separate.
All is being fixed as soon as I can.
Thanks Dave!
I'm still looking forward to seeing your results with your transmission.
All is being fixed as soon as I can.
dbsupra90;1372413 said:
Thanks Dave!
I'm still looking forward to seeing your results with your transmission.
Congrats Brent.
But seriously, go standalone and never look back. Knowing you, you'll love to tinker with it, rather than "fighting" with the stock ECU.
But seriously, go standalone and never look back. Knowing you, you'll love to tinker with it, rather than "fighting" with the stock ECU.
Nice job Brent.. I remember when you were running high 15's at the track. Now you have a potential 10 second car.
You have a nice simple setup that gets the job done. If your happy, keep it the way it is. If not, standalone and cams would get you even more power and bigger headaches.
You have a nice simple setup that gets the job done. If your happy, keep it the way it is. If not, standalone and cams would get you even more power and bigger headaches.
Supra28;1373258 said:
I don't know about that... haha, you can't even hear anything besides screaming distortion from the cellphone mic. :rofl:
Thanks for the comments.
I'm going to change out the IC pipes and throttle body, then re-dyno at about 27-30psi and try to break 680hp or so, then if all hangs together I'll spray the 100 shot with some timing retard.
Till then, I'm going to continue planning the TH350 swap.
Congrats Brent, sick numbers. I can't imagine hitting that on the street of NYC, my 500+rwhp runs out of room pretty darn fast.
I'd say get the AEM and save the engine from that 80's technology.
I'd say get the AEM and save the engine from that 80's technology.
MK3Brent;1372017 said:Finally... Finally I got the time to strap down to the dyno and spend the time needed to get the car running "decent" air fuels.
Ever since adding the 2nd fuel pump, it's been a little bit of a handful trying not to correct too much with the piggybacks+AFPR.
At the end of the day, I feel more and more like going stand-alone.
With 27psi, the output was 627hp/574tq.
AFR's are still on the richer side, but I plan on spraying soon.
Everything ran very well up to 600hp, then any more boost would pop my one IC pipe off. I will be re-doing all the IC pipes soon too.
This dyno was kinda spur of the moment, so I didn't have my nice video camera, but a friend taped with his cell phone. Dunno if I'll post that or not.
How big are your intercooler pipes?