Money, the root of all?

Joel W.

Just A Jedi
Nov 7, 2005
1,561
0
0
Washington
I worked at my high school doing ground maintanance an hour in the morning and four hours after school and full time in the summer, all through high school, so I could support myself.

One thing I saw alot of was waste*, I remember having to burn boxes of brand new school books (maybe a few years old but never used) because if they did not get rid of them, they could not get new funding next year. Too much waste*..

fixed*
 

Joel W.

Just A Jedi
Nov 7, 2005
1,561
0
0
Washington
Thanks..:naughty: .It's cool, That's how I learn..(I may not do that again now). Spell checker only works if it is spelled wrong.


I need a grammar checker!!!
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
This thread is a riot.

I hear the cry that "we will not be ignored" from the non land owners who are making it on their own.. BIG DEAL MAN.

I lived on 450.00 per month for 6 years while going to college. (Sometimes less, and very few times more, and I worked all my summers to save up money for school, rode a bike to save money, drove old beater cars when I could afford them, and walked when I could not.) That 450 includes my rent, and my food bills, everything.

When I got out of school, it was not easy either. My first job only paid 14k a year. It was a few years before I was making 28k again, what I made BEFORE I WENT TO SCHOOL... (And only after I decided to go back to welding and mechanical work, a skilled trade I was making money in before I went to school to get a degree...)

So, you guys complaining about the cost of living, or education, I've been there, and done that and have, like you, worked my ass off to get where I'm at today.

Does that change my opinion that only land owners and military should vote? Nope, not in the least.
Renters and others who don't own land are not worthy of voting rights, and don't appreciate what they are voting for since they often don't pay federal income taxes at all anyway. And they pay little or no state taxes beyond the sales taxes we are all burdened with to pay for social programs and whatnot that liberal elite jackasses have forced on us by passing laws to spend money they never earned.

History has proven that if you give those that have not earned the money the right to vote about how to spend it, they will vote themselves wealth, and will become even less inclined to work and make money since they can just vote themselves more of it.

Your own comments on here have affirmed this fact.

On the two pages of wiki and websters trying to figure out what a Liberal Elite point of view is, I'll make it simple for you all.

Liberals in this context, are more interested in spending your money on whatever they think you should want them to than producing that money with hard work. They will tell you flat out that you don't know how to spend your own money, and they who are educated and in power know better than you on how to spend it wisely for social change and equality for all as a result. (Communist ideals disguised as "socialism for the democracy..") Whatever.

"Elite" people in this context, are the ones who have a masters degree, or think they should, and know that they are smarter than you are. The really funny ones are the "New Rich" liberal elite's who made it big selling reccords, acting, or writing a book, and now with all this money and fame, they suddenly have the ear of the media to listen to them, so they repeat what they are told by liberal elite handlers to promote whatever socialistic program is on the agenda for the moment. (It's running the gamut from anti war, to global warming fear mongering and every other socialist/communist ideal they can heap on during an interview.) I wonder if they realize what puppets they look and sound like on national TV? (Gina Davis is lately a good example.. Climbing up in trees, or the double whammy communist duo of Susan Sarandon and live in Tim Robbins spouting off about war and gobal politics.. Like either of them have a clue about the world beyond Hollywood? ) At least Joel, you can take solice in the fact that they are likely land owners, and can vote!

BTW, I bought my first house when I was 26, so I would not have been able to vote in my world untill then, and I'm pretty OK with that idea. No need to rebel and get off your soap box for the ammo box man, just buy a home.

Your comment about government holding you back from buying land was weird? What are you talking about? Learn a skill, get a job and save your money. Then buy your home/land. Easy as can be man. There are no laws against it, and in fact, the laws are in your favor as a first time home buyer! I'm not really going to see those laws changing, and I've already proven that most of the Americans producing something already are land owners anyway, so what's the problem?
 

Joel W.

Just A Jedi
Nov 7, 2005
1,561
0
0
Washington
What part of still struggling don't you understand? I still contribute! I pay taxes also..

I would buy a house, Adjuster, but I have not had the best of luck. Property prices have doubled here in the last 2 years and I can not afford to buy. I have not had any help (I am single) and the bond (insurance) REQUIRED to operate my business went from $12,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 and my normal insurance (ALSO REQUIRED) is also increasing much like the co2 rate (It's off the chart)... I can no longer afford to keep my business running at this rate, thanks to men like you and what you do! :icon_mad:

How do you sleep at night or look at your self in the mirror. :3d_frown:

I will still fight you every day and twice on Sundays if you try and change my right to vote! I do not want to take your money nor do I care how you spend it so get over it..You are entitled to be elite..

When you don't make much money it is hard to save it. The system works for you? Why am I not suprised.. Well your one of the lucky ones I guess...

BTW, I bought my first house when I was 26,
BTW, just how many houses do you own??

So, if you really want to change the system like you say you do?? Guess what,,, You are a libral now...
Welcome to the club. ;)
 

SupraDerk

The Backseat Flyer
Sep 17, 2005
546
0
0
40
Tallahassee
Adjuster said:
"Elite" people in this context, are the ones who have a masters degree, or think they should, and know that they are smarter than you are.

My dad has a masters degree, he's a real humble man. He never mentions the fact that he has one unless someone talks down to him and assumes he's never been to college. I don't think your definition of "elite" is a good one.


And you're saying (even though you've just said you were in the same shoes as everyone else struggling through college) that if you don't own land you shouldn't have the right to vote? Do you realize what that would imply?

That since I rent a house because paying for school is already killing me, that I have no say in the policies my government makes that have to deal with Education, financial aid, interest rates, tuition rate hikes anything that has a DIRECT effect towards me? Wow.

So when the state of Florida wanted to do away with the Bright Future's Scholarship (a scholarship that's helping me pay for school) so that no one else could use this state money to go to help pay for school, you don't think I should be able to vote yes or no on that?

I do not agree with that at all.
 

Maroon88

I collect BHG's
May 3, 2005
50
0
0
Cincinnati, OH
Only allowing land owners to vote because renters don't pay taxes is, well, stupid. Since I bought a house I pay less in federal taxes because of the deductions that come with it (interest and all) and all the property taxes go to the county and city I live in. In fact, I have less bills owning my house than I did renting an my last apartment. Just because you own a house does not make you a good citizen, a good citizen is someone who votes and cares what happens in their community and you dont need to own a house for that.

BTW, I believe money is a tool to be used by any who have it. As far as what makes something evil is either intent or perception.
 

Joel W.

Just A Jedi
Nov 7, 2005
1,561
0
0
Washington
Only allowing land owners to vote because renters don't pay taxes is, well, stupid

It's not stupid if your intention is to turn the poor working man/woman into slaves!!! Because that is what he wants..

Edit:

Re: Insurers' profitable perfect storm, March 21.


So State Farm upped its profit by 89 percent last year? This even after four hurricanes? How nice! After reading that, people should be marching on Tallahassee wanting insurance premiums returned. But they won't find it on the front page. Of course it's buried deep. And this incredible profitability still does not appear on Jeb Bush's radar. Why is that, I wonder?

I, for one, firmly believe the word "crisis" belongs in any news story concerning insurance companies, rate increases and, of course "tort reform." But the crisis we should be reading about is the absence of facts and figures to support the agenda of the tort reformers/insurance company lapdogs.


--- Mark S. Roman, Clearwater
Promote insurance competition
Re: Insurers' profitable perfect storm.

I read with interest Robert Trigaux's column noting that some of the big insurance companies are profitable on a national basis. That's interesting, but it's irrelevant to Florida's problem.

The fact that property insurers are making money in other states is separate from what's happening here in Florida. When I pay my homeowners insurance, I don't expect my premiums to help subsidize earthquake losses in California, tornado losses in Kansas or ice storm losses in Maine. Nor should Floridians expect homeowners in other states to subsidize our hurricanes.

Homeowners want property insurance to be more affordable. But we also want lawmakers to improve the property insurance market and attract more insurers to our state. We need to find ways to attract more competition, which will lower prices and give us more choices. (big Insurance):3d_frown:

I've read that some insurers are urging legislators to make it easier for insurers to draw money from the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, or "Cat" Fund. That makes sense, because part of our premium goes into this fund and it is supposed to help us when hurricanes strike. Lawmakers should make the Cat Fund money more available, because that's one way to help improve the market and bring in more insurers.


-- Dennis McCowin, Seminole
A picture of corporate greed
Re: Insurers' profitable perfect storm.

The numbers in this story clearly show corporate greed. Since this information is easily available to everyone, they also show that the large insurance companies are much more important than the average Floridian to the politicians in Tallahassee.

Along these same corporate greed lines, the oil administration in Washington tries to make us believe that the price we pay at the gas pump is strictly due to the increased price of crude oil. Simple bookkeeping along with simple math tells us that if a company increases its revenue solely to offset its increased expenses, then its profits would remain flat. Yet the major oil companies' profits and stock prices have soared higher, much like those of the insurance companies. Gee, another lie from those who claim to be "moral Christian folk" up in Washington.

Will the voters remember this?

It's all starting to make sense now....No wonder you like the gas companies so much...I am done with this guy..:3d_frown:
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
That cracks me up.
Just because I work for an insurance company does not make me evil there Joel.

Just because you don't own a house now does not mean you ever will.

I only own one house. I started to try and own rentals, but it was not profitable, so I sold my rental property and moved on to other investments.

Property prices have been going up for years. The recient rise in prices will have some up's and down's, but the general trend of real estate values is upwards for the most part. (So buy low, and sell when the price has gone up to where you think selling is a good idea.)

It's called making your money work for you, and it's why we invest money in companies and ideas we think will make us more money. There is nothing wrong with this idea, and it's a simple truth of becoming wealthy.

If your waiting for the government to solve your problems, your going to die poor and sour at the world.

I sleep at night very well. :) (When I'm not on here typing up some rebuttal to one post or another.)

If you hate insurance so much, don't buy it. (But you know that you can't absorb the losses when they happen, and the risk is too great to run without it, so buck up and live with it, or get out of the industry your in. Whatever it is. I don't set rates, or sell insurance. I only deal with the losses, so I'm pretty tired of people saying they hate insurance as I'm paying them money for the loss. It's not a savings account. You don't get back what you paid into the system. If you want to save money, go to a bank. If you want to save you ass when you screw up and cause damage to another person, and your butt is on the line, then you'd better have paid your insurance premium and have coverage for the loss. (Or get ready to lose it all and start over again.)

If you think your hurricane insurance is too high, move to where they don't have hurricanes. (Or go without it and chance loosing it all.) Same goes with flood insurance.
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
Oh, and you folks that think it's wise to allow people who do not make the money or produce anything to vote on how to spend that money and product? Well you need to read up on Roman history, or Persian, or any of the "great" civilizations, and see how they acted just before they collapsed and were overrun by their enimies.

Basicly they allowed the non producers to vote and spend the money on themselves, and the society quickly fell into ruin, and was conqured by stronger people.

Let's not let the USA fall into the same LEE trap. Communism failed, so why do you support it so much here in the States? Socialistic ideals are the start of the death of a nation. Just look at history.
 

Joel W.

Just A Jedi
Nov 7, 2005
1,561
0
0
Washington
My bis insurance is a manditory requirement by my state.. If I don't buy it, the state takes my bis license away, same with my bond. They are required.

BTW, The Romans, Persians and I bet all your "great" civilizations had slaves also.. ;)
 

Maroon88

I collect BHG's
May 3, 2005
50
0
0
Cincinnati, OH
You just can't say no to insurance. I have to have insurance on my car and keep it registered whether I drive it or not and I have to have insurance on my house as a condition of my home loan. I am not against any business making money because thats how the economy works but business (such as oil and gas companies) should price products by cost to produce not having them set by markets and traders.

So what makes people who rent so worthless and undeserving of government participation in a government of the people?
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
I did not say renters are worthless, and I don't think of them as slaves..

What I'm saying is voting is a privilege, not something you should be entitled too.

When you show your commitment to the country by either owning land/home etc, or serving in the military, you should be allowed to vote.

Why is that such a bad idea for the LEE? It would kick them where they go rooting for votes. (By telling lies no less, but the audience is so ignorant for the most part, they belive the lies and vote for the LEE anyway.)

If voters were the ones serving in the military, and owners of property, we would have laws that protected the producers of this land, and not laws that promote being lazy and producing nothing.
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
I belive your right Joel. It will never happen, we have about as much chance becoming a voting society based on land ownership as we do seeing slavery coming back into widespread use in the USA. (And I'm not in favor of that in any way, shape or form incase you did not know.)
 

Joel W.

Just A Jedi
Nov 7, 2005
1,561
0
0
Washington
Well that is a relief Adjuster. It makes me feel better anyways.. :)

My question to you now is, what can we do to better inform the public on the issues at hand and how do we get them off their asses and out voting??

Personally I would like to do away with the electoral vote. It does not seem fair to me that 90% of the people vote one way, and the electoral vote goes the other way and the people lose. Seems wrong to me??

Thank you!!!
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
You mean the electoral college?

I think it did what it was supposed to do, so why would we want to do away with it?

IIRC, it's designed to keep the cities from rulling the country, and that's what it did. (Popular vote is not fair for the states with smaller populations, and it's not fair for cities with 12 million living in them to be counted like a state.)

If we only let land owners and the military vote, the college would not be needed actually.
 

Joel W.

Just A Jedi
Nov 7, 2005
1,561
0
0
Washington
Yes, My bad... That is what I meant (electoral college).

It does not seem fair to me in some ways... I guess you have a valid point here though......;)

Whooot!!!

We all still need to vote, even the poor..:)