91 supra rear subrframe.

bsupra

Member
Oct 1, 2006
140
0
16
California
I know this is a repetitive question. I was just wondering if anybody can tell the exact difference between the earlier 91 subframe vs later 91 subframe? Pictures maybe?
 

LordDigital

Member
May 21, 2005
360
1
16
46
Chicago
hvyman;1927295 said:
Difference was 89+.

Was a little beefier and had the bolt in braces. That's it.

A little more precisely - braces were added due to issues that the factory racing teams were having with the subframes in the Turbo A model and then propagated in all production MA70s - first officially homologation in he JAF book as "Reinforced Suspension Member" on Nov of 1988 with a picture taken in Japan on July 16 of the same year. This will explain why some 88 cars (like mine) had the taps on the subframe ,but no actual braces;)

And yes - no changes in 91 ... the subrame on my 92 was the same old - bad CAD-less design ,bad Toyota welds ,etc ...