7MGTE question?

gmoney

supra is as stupid does!
Apr 22, 2005
97
0
0
40
CT
home1.myspace.com
What causes these engines to go through head gaskets so quickly? Or what is the main cause of the head gaskets going bad? is there anyway to prevent it?
 

Oper8or

New Member
Apr 21, 2005
80
0
0
51
Greenback, TN.
From what I've been told and read the factory torque setting on the head was wrong. That is all I know on the subject. I'm sure the others will tell you the exact reasons why.
My Sup went 154k without blowing it. 16k of it was my driving after I bought it. It sat for a while before I bought it so maybe the gasket had time to get soft and corrode. I'll wait and see what they say as well.
 

GrimJack

Administrator
Dec 31, 1969
12,377
3
38
56
Richmond, BC, Canada
idriders.com
It's entirely torque related. Toyota spec'd the torque at 58 foot/lbs, and analysis of the headbolts by a third party since has told us that 72 foot/lbs is what should have been used.

New headgasket and bolts torqued properly makes for a bulletproof engine - as long as you keep the oil level up. :)
 

IJ.

Grumpy Old Man
Mar 30, 2005
38,728
0
0
61
I come from a land down under
As GJ says the tq settings used were a bit off!

Electrolysis in older motors that haven't had the correct coolant is also a factor as the aluminium in the head around the water passages is the first to go!

(there are a few of different ways the gasket can "blow" ie: Coolant>Sump
Comp>Sump Comp>Coolant all of em suck though)
 

aye mate

Hiatus over.
Mar 30, 2005
1,926
0
0
Maryland
Werd about the low torque setting. I replaced my HG with an oem one and used ARP head bolts torqued to 75ft.lbs. Just make sure you also keep plenty of oil in there. I have replaced all the seals(2 front mains, cam seals, rear main and valve seals) and I still have a little oil consumption(probably from the turbo and/or blowby).
 

Boostedstr8six

I have better SA than you
Mar 30, 2005
401
0
16
Near Columbia, the river
Yep, not clamped hard enough.

One thing: IIRC, 72lbs/ft was based on the yield strength of the stock bolts with the head expansion factored in as well. More than 72 and the risk was high of deforming the bolts after a few heat cycles and losing clamping force. Could be wrong though, please don't :stickpoke if I am.
 

lagged

1991 1JZ
Mar 30, 2005
2,616
0
0
38
new rochelle
GrimJack said:
You are not wrong, 72 was the perfect spot for the stock bolts.

Of course, most of us use ARP bolts now, and those are good to 125 foot pounds at least. :)

but you wouldnt want to torque it down that much on a composite (stock) head gasket! :icon_razz
 

Oper8or

New Member
Apr 21, 2005
80
0
0
51
Greenback, TN.
WOW.. I was correct then. It's good to see I can still put my .02 in and not get slammed.. :biggrinki I'm going to pat myself on the back now and hush. I dont want to shoot myself in the foot by getting the next one wrong. :icon_razz
 

Jetfixr757

Sleeper
Mar 30, 2005
259
0
16
59
Cocoa, Florida
Is it recommended to replace the stock head bolts once used, due to stretch for higher torque, my 3S-GTE (ex All-Trac) the TSRM mentioned that. It also had a different precedure for torquing the bolts, take it to a value and go 90 degrees, that really put a squeeze on the gasket.
William 89T
 

7MGTEJoe

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
80
0
0
46
Salinas, CA
Technically the 7M head bolts are reusable even with the higher torque. 72 ft/lbs still lies within the elastic portion of the bolt. On the other hand replacing them is cheap insurance. Personally I'd replace them.
 

MRSUPRA

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
838
0
0
Maryland
I think there may be more to it than just the head not being torqued down hard enough. MK4's run 30psi on stock headgaskets with no issues. I ran 24psi with a Greddy metal headgasket and ARP headbolts, and lifted the head off the gasket. I beleive it was heat related more than anything.
 

gmoney

supra is as stupid does!
Apr 22, 2005
97
0
0
40
CT
home1.myspace.com
well the shop were my car was called me up to tell me my headgasket was fine! it was the head that was shot :thumbsdow but my buddy has an extra engine and i picked up a head with 100,000 miles on it for 150 bucks with the cams and whatnot. so that car will be good tomarrow...
 

GrimJack

Administrator
Dec 31, 1969
12,377
3
38
56
Richmond, BC, Canada
idriders.com
MRSUPRA said:
I think there may be more to it than just the head not being torqued down hard enough. MK4's run 30psi on stock headgaskets with no issues. I ran 24psi with a Greddy metal headgasket and ARP headbolts, and lifted the head off the gasket. I beleive it was heat related more than anything.
You neglected to mention how much torque you are using on the head gasket. Mk4 is a whole different ballgame, 30psi on a stock Mk4 is nothing like 30 psi on a stock Mk3.