2JZ NA-T 475/403 on 6262 @ 17.4 psi

[rtrdpenguin]

I have an intake manifold and larger TB, but honestly am not sure what it does to the powerband since I never had the stock stuff on there. I kind of wish I went with a real TT, cams are a lot easier to find for those haha.

I also have a video, but this is on 14 psi (~400 rwhp) and a lame low-speed pull (also, not sure if it's private or public...):

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10150643117003173

 

[88mk3supra]

Nice intake man looks sharp and car looks and sounds good. Yea cams are a lot harder to find than the gte :/ , forgot to ask are you running 2j harness and aem or 7m electronics?

 

[rtrdpenguin]

AEM + harness I made from scratch

 

[IBoughtASupra]

EMS = Any Electrical Piece You Want.

Got to love it!

 

[88mk3supra]

good choice sir. aem is great does wonders! good luck man cant wait to see it put out even more!

 

[MRSUPRA]

The head and intake have held the ge back a lot from what I've seen on many dyno's with similar setups compared to actual gte

The cylinder head on the GE actually flows slightly better than a GTE. Not sure how much the GE manifold restricts.

 

[jmcboost]

Nice #'S!!! I went with web cams on mine and really like them. Opens up on the top end better. I also have a .68 A/R on my master power t-70 and that hot side makes it restrictive after 6500rpms.

 

[gurley0916]

The cylinder head on the GE actually flows slightly better than a GTE. Not sure how much the GE manifold restricts.

I will not believe this and i hope no one else does unless he posts numbers to prove this.

 

[rtrdpenguin]

Nice #'S!!! I went with web cams on mine and really like them. Opens up on the top end better. I also have a .68 A/R on my master power t-70 and that hot side makes it restrictive after 6500rpms.

Did the cams help above 6500 with the .68 housing? I'd like it to continue making power up there but am not sure I want to switch to a larger housing haha.

 

[jmcboost]

Yes, they are supposed to and they did on mine until my clutch starting slipping. . I upgraded to an ACT extreme clutch and now it keeps pulling pretty hard in higher RPM but I can still kind of feel it fall off a little after 6500 rpms. It's not as bad with the upgraded cams in as with stock cams. I really like the .68 AR, it's great for spooling quick. I'm switching to a precision 6775 with a .96 AR so now I'll be going for higher WHP #'s but have a lot more lag. I'll see if I can tolerate the lag for power. LOL

 

[gurley0916]

Yes you will experiene the top end loss on a .68 its not a huge loss but the power stops. Why not look at a divided .84 quicker spool and has been poven to not cause loss of power below 800 hp.

 

[MRSUPRA]

I will not believe this and i hope no one else does unless he posts numbers to prove this.

Lol. You can search it if you want. It has been proven on Supraforums.

 

[gurley0916]

Lol. You can search it if you want. It has been proven on Supraforums.

lol

 

[steven89]

http://www.supramania.com/forums/showthread.php?99476-Supra-Head-Flow-(5M-7M-1JZ-2JZGE-2JZGTE)

2jz-gte head flows more, but the 2jz-ge exhaust side looks to be similar/close.

Ported for ported though, seems to be about the same or close.. again

 

[MRSUPRA]

http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sh...-squish-quot/page2&highlight=2JZ-GE+head+flow

Here is another good read. I think the consensis is that both cylinder heads will get the job done.

 

[1986.5supra_kid]

so how did the 6262 work out for you? did you go to a .84 divided?