1990 MKIII Brand New 92KM fully loaded!

[Flateric]

Maybe this is a repost, maybe it's not but I had never seen it in these forums. So just because it's damn amazing I'll post it up.

It's a brand new 1990 MKIII Turbo Supra fully loaded. Yet again right here in my city. (Many remember that we also have a MKIV in a different dealership with 11,000 on the clock).

They are selling it if you wanna dish out 50k CDN for a Supra with only 92KM on it. Damn thats less than some cars after a few test drives.

Here's the link........

http://autotrader.ca/used_cars_Cars...0&CompanyID=2004101215371706&r=calgaryalberta

Think it has a BHG? LOL

 

[drunk_medic]

I remember seeing a pristine blue '87 Turbo with 6k miles on it for $27k USD a few years ago. These things happen.

 

[Poodles]

Repost of sorts as that car has been at that dealer for a LONG time now. Mayb they're falling on hard times and are trying to get it out there a bit more to sell...

 

[modmonster2008]

its just overexpensive, i mean u can get a mk4 and still have money with $49k. even with 92 on the clock it shouldnt be that much imo

 

[Poodles]

How do you figure? Adjusted for inflation it's right where it should be price wise.

 

[Mastapip]

Ha, the KBB on that car is $5.4K

Absolutely beautiful and all that, but not worth 50k. I'd pay 10k though for sure.

 

[Poodles]

/facepalm

It's NOT a used car people...

 

[Mondo]

Wow.....

 

[lewis15498]

If I had $$$ to burn I would be on a plane to go get that right now!

 

[92nsx]

Yep very much a repost. I still dont think it is worth the $$$$$ they are asking.

 

[Nghty89]

wait... only 92 miles...?? How has NO ONE BOUGHT THIS CAR?!?! I know it wasn't that expensive a few years ago. I would probably pay $26K for that, but $50K is a little much. You can get something way more modern and quicker for $50K, but then again... 92 on the clock.... wow... Simply Pristine. I can completely understand how they want the $50K with it being in such good condition.

 

[JDMMA70]

I think that car is worth every penny.

 

[Poodles]

92km

 

[Keros]

that's just shy of 58 miles, for you yanks.

I've seen that car in person, it's worth every nickle.

It's never been washed, never been waxed, and has probably never been out in sunlight for more than a few minutes. They won't even let you touch the paint. It's in a roped off area and covered in DO NOT TOUCH signs. The interior, from what I could see, was obviously superb shadow grey leather. The driver's seat has likely not even been sat in a dozen times, and the passenger seat probably not even half that.

It's only fault is that it's a 1990 instead of a 1992.

In the end though, it's a bittersweet car to buy... do you drive it and destroy a one of a kind collectors car; most likely the ONLY mint, new MkIII in existance... or do you let it rot in a garage?

I wouldn't pay 50 grand to punish myself like that.

 

[Wills7MGTE]

Well as "Pristine" as it is, I buy a car to drive and enjoy not to worry over and protect, for that much dough I'd rather buy a 1997 targa 6 speed MK4 or a buuilt 2JZ swapped MK3 or something wild and fun and functional, they outta sell it to toyota for their mueseum.

 

[Supracentral]

How has NO ONE BOUGHT THIS CAR?!?!

Because anyone with the financial sense to have $50K available also has the financial sense to know this car isn't worth it...

It's beautiful, I had a red 92 Turbo that looked exactly like it, and I'd love to have it again, but not for that kind of money...

 

[nick88]

The asking price should be What is should of been back in 1990. Look at your registrations and think if this car was the msrp listed, would it still be for sale. It would of been long gone. It's so damn expensive that Toyota won't even buy it for their museum.

 

[Poodles]

Like I said, it's adjusted for inflation

 

[nick88]

Like I said, it's adjusted for inflation

Almost double the list price?

 

[drunk_medic]

Ohh.. 92 km, not 92k miles. That makes a little more sense.