Search results

13:1 is a pretty reasonable target with an NA engine they don't require anywhere near as much enrichment as a turbo engine hell some more modern engines run 14.6:1 at wot.

Good start, now lets see the progress pics.

Can you have dangerously rich? Looks like the torque falls of as soon as it switches rich at 82mph if you could find a way to get that back up to around 13:1 you would recover a lot of that lost torque.

You're missing 1.86% of your car!

Shame all the pics are dead links now.

I have noticed all forums that I used to frequent are now pretty dead. For this forum it seems like it must have been a recent thing as if you look at the whats going on bit at the bottom there were 597 people online on 31st August 2015 so peak traffic was only 2 years ago. Seems like lots of...

Have you found which cylinder is misfiring? Have you done a compression check?

I has a similar issue with MAFT pro years ago and never resloved it. I could get it all set up nicely and running great then shut the car down and leave it for an hour and it would run at 12:1 when previously it was 14.7 - 15:1 when cruising. Sorry I'm no help but just thought you should know...

Are you on AEM V1?

110C is very hot I get a sweat on if my car gets anywhere near 100C

I'm assuming you used two resistor blocks to go sequential?

Sounds like the ports are back to front so all your boost pressure is going to the spring side of the wastegate. Or least thats what happened to me with my controller when I had my car in bits and made that slip up on putting it back together. I use a gizzmo boost controller so yours may operate...

Because newness of the web design determins the quality of his work? I prefer plane and simple websites I'm sick to death of all these animated websites with loads of gimiky shit all over them.

Something don't seem right there, punching your numbers for speed and weight into a 1/4 ET calculator it comes back with 563hp. Or if you put your weight and power it comes back with 108 trap speed.

My gizzmo EBC has this function and you can set the time duration on it and if you press the button more than once it adds another dose of duty cycle ontop of what you already added. So if you had your base boost at 20 psi you could set it so one push gave you 23psi and a second push gave you...

It does work as it alows some air to bypass the sensor, Did it on my car with a wideband years ago and the afr's were still in the low 11's even at 14psi.

What is the record for a CT26 based turbo at the strip? From the top of my head its a high 11 I think? Would love to see a CT26 based car trap at 120+

So am I reading this right? You have a full turbo back exhaust but still running 7psi boost? Get that boost cranked up to just below fuel cut and the car will come alive. If you want to raise fuel cut a tad drill out the aluminium bung on the side of AFM and wind the screw out till its all the...

The guy you are thinking of is John Lunsford here is a link to his site. http://www.jblmk3.com/

A well driven stock MK3 would cross the line at just over 90mph to be nearly 10mph down on that your car must only be making 170whp. I ran a sucky 14.7 @102 with a 2.4 60' running about 13psi.