New sig, thoughts?

vas85

SupraNut
Sep 29, 2006
391
0
0
Sydney, AU
What do you guys think of my new sig? Use it or keep the old one, I've got that feul spelling error.. LOL dont know why I have a tendancy to spell it like that... and thought i'd create something else, rather than edit that one.

vas85sig02sdx5.jpg


or my current 1 with me going around to fixing the typo.
 

vas85

SupraNut
Sep 29, 2006
391
0
0
Sydney, AU
Ma70.Ent said:
They are both plain....there's no difference IMO.

lol yeah i can go all wicked but i like it simple I guess.. to not look too busy, umm mighit do what Yellow13 said or try some other idea..
 

Loki

The Future is Unwritten
Mar 30, 2005
2,760
0
36
39
Prince George, B.C.
I think the older one looks better, and there is nothing wrong with having a simple sig, you don't have to have all kinds of crazy effects to have a good looking sig :dunno:
 

vas85

SupraNut
Sep 29, 2006
391
0
0
Sydney, AU
Loki said:
I think the older one looks better, and there is nothing wrong with having a simple sig, you don't have to have all kinds of crazy effects to have a good looking sig :dunno:

Somebody that thinks like me!! yay!

Just made my final sig that I'll use. If i had the fuel spelt correctly Loki I wouldn't have even bothered trying to change, but replicating the original to fix the error, thought i'll make another.

I've now gone from this (because of spelling error):
vas85suprasig2ad6.jpg

to... (would have been smaller for forum use)
vas85sig02sdx5.jpg

this...
vas85is4.jpg


Oh and when I said in a previous post about wanting it simple, and not busy... by that I mean not overdone... like when i see riced up cars with 50million boost gauges how can you possibly feel comfortable and just take it ezy? in a car like that... will feel uneven.. as it to me would feel 'too busy'... I use that same point for images.. about not being too busy.. for liking them along the simpler lines of things.
 
Last edited: