View Full Version : Took down an RX-8
I ended up next to a silver RX-8 at a stop light. I could tell he was going to gun it because he was slowly creeping right before the light turned green. We both hit it at the same time. Through first gear we were nearly even, but then I pulled away in second. I had clearly won by the end of second and I didn't want to go too much over the speed limit so I let up once I shifted into third.
I assume he was stock.
suprakid24
02-15-2008, 07:11 PM
nice, are you stock?
88jspec
02-15-2008, 07:27 PM
good kill swaq, what r your mods, i bet this guy was suprised...
IwantMKIII
02-15-2008, 07:47 PM
not to bust on your kill here but its my understanding the newer RX-8's are slugs...i could be wrong though
My mods are listed in my profile. Basically exhaust, intake, boost controller, and some other goodies.
not to bust on your kill here but its my understanding the newer RX-8's are slugs...i could be wrong though
Yeah, I wasn't surprised I beat him. I think the RX-8's have been way over-hyped. The RX-7 turbos were lighter and had more power, if I recall correctly.
a_sesshoumaru
02-15-2008, 09:20 PM
that´s right, my friend beat one in his ep82 4efte, rx7 twin turbo has a lot more power
DegreE
02-15-2008, 10:00 PM
The RX8 is a slug, but its mainly a handling car. They're great for Auto-X. And for being a 1.3L, they get really shitty gas mileage.
Maybe if Mazda would have boosted it from factory it would be as bad. But these automakers are so scared to create a factory boosted car these days you don't see as many factory forced induction cars as you did in the 80's-early 90's.
I think it has to do with the EPA. Goddamn hippies.
themadhatter
02-16-2008, 12:06 AM
what are you talking about man there are all kinds of factory "boosted" cars running around now adays srt-4,ss cobalt,wrx,evo,mazda 3 speed just to name a few
marc1131
02-16-2008, 12:19 AM
what are you talking about man there are all kinds of factory "boosted" cars running around now adays srt-4,ss cobalt,wrx,evo,mazda 3 speed just to name a few
not to mention all those nice diesel trucks runnin around
Mr.PFloyd
02-16-2008, 02:30 AM
the 1.3B is technically a 2.6 litre... but we won't get into that lol. Nice Kill!
NocturnalKitty
02-16-2008, 04:57 AM
yeah i have heard the same on the rx8 as far as the slug bit, though they aren't bad in the corners...had a fun time w/one in some twisties one night while i was driving my old mk3. seemed like he wanted to play a little so i gave chase...he let up after a few mins. it was fun though.
You can't feel them accelerate at all. I was in a lightly modded one and I didn't even notice him floor it. The kid also got like 15MPG mixed... My friend gets better than that in his 5.7l Camaro.
buldozr
02-16-2008, 05:22 PM
burning gas in the rx7/8 is the least of your worries, its burning oil you have to worry about, expect atleast 1 to 2 quarts per oil change needed. Usually its due to improper break in but most is just the nature of the beast.
burning gas in the rx7/8 is the least of your worries, its burning oil you have to worry about, expect atleast 1 to 2 quarts per oil change needed. Usually its due to improper break in but most is just the nature of the beast.
If your rotary is not burning oil, you've got yourself a problem. Rotaries squirt oil into the housings to lubricate the apex seals.
GeneStarWindGSW
02-19-2008, 02:05 PM
If your rotary is not burning oil, you've got yourself a problem. Rotaries squirt oil into the housings to lubricate the apex seals.
This is correct because i own a RX-7 :biglaugh:
i always watch my Oil pressure guage.
Btw, the RX-7 has a neat feature called the idiot cluster which tells you if anything goes wrong in the car. Supras should have these :biglaugh:
pogoism9
02-19-2008, 02:24 PM
If your rotary is not burning oil, you've got yourself a problem. Rotaries squirt oil into the housings to lubricate the apex seals.
And most of them from 03-05 were recalled for that very reason. Faulty oil injectors.
GeneStarWindGSW
02-19-2008, 02:47 PM
Well if your talking about RX-8 thats a big different story.
My 88 RX-7 has been real good to me it just eats a quart of oil after about 5k-10k miles or depending on how you drive because it squirts more oil in the more your on the throttle.
arizzle
02-19-2008, 03:18 PM
the rx8 makes more power then the twin turbo'd rx7.. but the rx7 has alot more torque then the rx8. and i know that the rx7 would kill my GTE. ive tryed my GF's brothers fd3s vs my supra and he gave me a good run!!! rx8 make more power without the turbo option which makes the car have more power butno torque. but good kill/
SupraN/Asty
02-19-2008, 03:55 PM
Good kill.
buldozr
02-19-2008, 06:45 PM
the rx8 makes more power then the twin turbo'd rx7.. but the rx7 has alot more torque then the rx8. rx8 make more power without the turbo option which makes the car have more power butno torque.
"As of today, August 22nd, 2003, the revised US-Spec Horsepower Rating of the RX-8 is 238 HP for the Manual 6port RENESIS, and 197 HP for the 4port Automatic RENESIS. The performance numbers advertised ARE NOT CHANGING. They have done many tests, in house, with magazines, and outside third parties, and they are still observing RX-8's that will do 0-60 in 5.9-6.0 seconds and quarter mines in 14.5 (best observed 1/4 mile run at Pomona Raceway was 14.48 at 96.1 MPH)" source - rotarynews.com
Specs on the FD3S(third gen rx7)
"As complex as all that sounds, it worked seamlessly and every third-generation RX-7 had a full 255 hp available at 6,500 rpm and 217 lb-ft of peak torque at 5,000 rpm."
"The third RX-7 did generate some astounding numbers. Road & Track had an R1 blitzing from zero to 60 in 5.5 seconds with the quarter being consumed in 14.0 seconds at 98.5 mph. Motor Trend had it doing those same tricks in 5.3 seconds and 13.9 seconds at 99.7 mph. This was one seriously fast car."- source is edmunds
rx8 sucks donkey balls for quarters, rx7 was where its at, emissions and reliability is the reason for no boost on the rx8. Engineers are trying to use technology instead of brute force for power...(which is not a bad thing by any means). Just dont post something that was pulled out of your ass.
GeneStarWindGSW
02-19-2008, 06:58 PM
I'd still take a FD over a FE anyday.
Ma70.Ent
02-19-2008, 10:27 PM
I'd still take a FD over a FE anyday.
I'm pretty sure they aren't called FEs. The code is SE3P IIRC? :)
And yeah, RX8s are pretty underpowered. 207 Horsepower, not so broad powerband. They're more handling oriented if anything
and i know that the rx7 would kill my GTE.
That tends to happen when you make the same power, but one car weighs 800 pounds less.
626na
02-20-2008, 02:45 AM
so a healthy na bpu will hang with a rx-8?
NeatOman
02-20-2008, 04:29 AM
A healthy M/T 7M-GE would Kill a Auto RX-8, I'm sure an auto would beat it too.
GeneStarWindGSW
02-20-2008, 06:00 AM
I'm pretty sure they aren't called FEs. The code is SE3P IIRC?
Well us people in RX7Club.com call it the FE, but it can also be called the SE3P.
FB = 1st gen RX-7 81-85 production
FC = 2nd gen RX-7 86-92 production
FC3C = 2nd gen RX-7 convertible
FC3S = 2nd gen RX-7 Coupe
FD = 3rd gen RX-7
FE = RX-8 (sometimes also called SE3P)
NocturnalKitty
02-20-2008, 06:56 AM
a buddy of mine's mom owns a rx8 and he says it handles pretty well. guess he took it into the mountains and even had his mom riding passenger. come to think of it i had one trying to play w/me on an on ramp a few yrs back as well...i was driving my 89 n/a at the time. it was a fun time...though playing w/that other one on the way up to one of the casinos was fun too. i hated the FD till about almost 10 yrs ago when i first got to drive one...this was the first car i started learning how to drive manual trans on. lol fun little rocket. now the FD and FC are both on my dream list. too bad my ex (obvious dumbass) blew 2 motors in just a few short months on that FD. first time was 2-3 weeks after he bought the car...2nd motor was just a short time later and completely his fault. motor go boom. he developed an oil leak and seized the motor. i told him not to put NOS on it...or to at least wait till he did some research. tried to remind him he wasn't dealing w/a 4 banger or anything like what he had delt w/before, but of course he didn't listen. :3d_frown:
what a shame...she was such a beauty. 93 red tt 5spd touring model.
Ma70.Ent
02-20-2008, 07:49 AM
Well us people in RX7Club.com call it the FE, but it can also be called the SE3P.
FB = 1st gen RX-7 81-85 production
FC = 2nd gen RX-7 86-92 production
FC3C = 2nd gen RX-7 convertible
FC3S = 2nd gen RX-7 Coupe
FD = 3rd gen RX-7
FE = RX-8 (sometimes also called SE3P)
I just assumed that you call them by the codes they were given. FD3S shortens down to FD, FC3S shortens down to FC, and as for those older ones, I know one of them had the code of SA22 but I don't really know what you guys call them. Oh well. I was just curious.
GeneStarWindGSW
02-20-2008, 08:12 AM
I just assumed that you call them by the codes they were given. FD3S shortens down to FD, FC3S shortens down to FC, and as for those older ones, I know one of them had the code of SA22 but I don't really know what you guys call them. Oh well. I was just curious.
Yea the SA model is just before the FB.
SA = 1979-1980 Rx-7
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/mdictionary.html
Yea the SA model is just before the FB.
SA = 1979-1980 Rx-7
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/mdictionary.html
Damn, beat me to it. What year is your 7?
Before I got my supra I was going to do a v8 fc build, guess that will have to wait till later.
Ma70.Ent
02-20-2008, 01:27 PM
Yea the SA model is just before the FB.
SA = 1979-1980 Rx-7
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/mdictionary.html
If 1st gen = SA, that means you call it by the first two letters in it's code name, which would make the "FE" an "SE" :)
Oh well. No point in debating it, haha.
GeneStarWindGSW
02-20-2008, 01:51 PM
No point in debating it, haha.
Yea, foreal its likes saying the our supra is an MA70 or an MK3. means the same thing =P
*edit*
you know after thinking a little bit, i clicked on that mazda link and read everything lol.
totally forgot about supramania =P
I feel enlightened now :chicken:
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.2 Copyright © 2010 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.