My Take on the 2020 Supra

GC89

BoostRodeo
Authorized Seller
Contributor
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,007
Likes
9
Location
Spokane, WA
#1
I originally told myself that I wouldn't post anything about the new Supra but being someone who has owned, worked on and driven every generation couldn't help it. There is so much distension about this car and my take is a bit different on how things will play out. I wish it wasn't because a part of me would like it to be a flop so that Toyota feels the disheartening disappointment than many enthusiast feel and might actually come to understand what is important to Supra owners and enthusiasts in a car. Or they could have just produced something that we loved.......that would have been great too.

In any case I thing they read things better than most people believe.

 

plaaya69

87T Supra
Authorized Seller
Contributor
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
1,292
Likes
50
Location
Lake County, IL
#2
Good pros and cons you have mentioned. I do think that this new Supra will bring in a new crowd of car buyers who don't even know any history of the previous generations so the Supra will be a brand new experience for them plus there is just people who want to buy new cars even if the some of the older ones were built better.

The middle of the front end looks like it has some inspiration from the 89-92 style front bumper. After seeing it at the Chicago auto show it does look a bit better in person:





But the 2020 Lexus RC F should have shared more parts with the new Supra instead:


 

GC89

BoostRodeo
Authorized Seller
Contributor
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,007
Likes
9
Location
Spokane, WA
#3
I am really hoping it looks better in person and also the hope driving experience wins me over. Part of me wants the car to fail and send a message to Toyota but I don't think that will happen and doubt they would listen anyway and would likely abandon the platform again so hoping for the best.

I have to say I am much more excited to get behind of the RC-F than the Supra though.
 

suprarx7nut

YotaMD.com author
Authorized Seller
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
3,969
Likes
28
Location
Arizona
#4
I feel similarly that it will be a fine car, but not what I wanted it to be. I wanted something overly reliable that's tunable OR something along the lines of an LFA successor at a high price point, but offering cutting edge performance.

I will say, though, I'm still very anxious to learn more about exactly what Toyota altered with the chassis compared to how BMW handed it over. So far, we haven't seen details and we know many parts are still obviously BMW. For an engineering study alone, I'd love to see that detail.
 

GC89

BoostRodeo
Authorized Seller
Contributor
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,007
Likes
9
Location
Spokane, WA
#5
I feel similarly that it will be a fine car, but not what I wanted it to be. I wanted something overly reliable that's tunable OR something along the lines of an LFA successor at a high price point, but offering cutting edge performance.

I will say, though, I'm still very anxious to learn more about exactly what Toyota altered with the chassis compared to how BMW handed it over. So far, we haven't seen details and we know many parts are still obviously BMW. For an engineering study alone, I'd love to see that detail.
I am interested to see what they altered as well, best case scenario would be they engineered/tweaked enough steering and suspension components to make the car feel like a Toyota sports car and the only downside will be how the drivetrain holds up...........and that slushbox part....
 

NashMan

WTF did he just wright ?
Authorized Seller
Joined
Aug 5, 2005
Messages
4,984
Likes
2
Location
Victoria BC
#6
My take on this car is I just don't under stand it beside them trying to make money on the name or when they went with bmw and they just really could not get along they all most parted ways wish they did. second I wish they just called it a 2000gt or more clever name 2020gt since it shares so much with that car than a supra that all ways been a 4 seater gt car.
The part I found funny the closer the car came to be out Tetsuya Tada stepped back and the head ceo took control tada was not even at the grand opening... makes you think.

as for the motor it's number one draw back that limts it to being push to bigger level is the cylinder head it has an coolant cooled internal exhuast manifold major down fall for upgrading turbos and adding rpm, second the motor has a very large stroke and will not take rpm all to well. as for the timing chain components being is dumb spot I just really hope it easy to get at all the timing sensors.

lastly bmw just showed off the b58s which is far more like a 2jz then this run of the mill paper weight. reasons why real exhaust manifold, twin turbo, destroked and still remains a 3 liter, far better oil pan for windage and block strength and a far better head with room for bigger valves so they claim. and boast 400 to 500 something horsepower what the supra should have had.

last but not least on the down low is nissan new z car and infiniti g series since they share the same plate forums is coming out very soon. So far its going to be verant of the gtr motor with less power most likly and fully made in japan. if this happens the supra will be dropped and be a dud.

this car just leaves alot of questions as to why this all happend and i know for damn well bmw ruin what could have been a really neat car.

reason being why on earth would any car company have 2 roadster type cars in there line up with the same engine lay out. the frs is a 2 seater and the new supra is a 2 seater frs is a manual and the supra is an auto only and the new 4 cylinder supra weighs more then the frs 28xx vs 33xx i6 so lets nock off 300 pounds for 2 less cylinders it's still heavyer.

so now you are thinking well they will just make the car better and improve it put a better engine in mabye bring out a manual.... nope will never happen because it joint advencher car so if one get one so does the other this has never happend with any joint advencher made cars ever because of rules of the contracts such as the z4 never getting a m package sinch the supra is the one that supposed to handle better and be more sporty . i can see the manual option possibly happen to improve sales if they are low.

as for toyota bragging about 50/50 weight lower sens of gravity and it's stiffer it's all crap marketing

the frs was 50/50 weight
frs thing about lower sens of gravity i call bs i bet they are the same or the boxer motor that sits side ways is better vs a i6 that has slight slant.
as for stiff ness duuuud it made to be convertible and being super stiff can be a draw back pending on how the suspension is built look at how the older nsx was built by honda was not made to be stiff so it would turn far better.


all in all the new supra is pile of rebadge crap trying to make money off a name