Need some help testing my pic hosting site

[Milenko]

Hey guys. Had to stay home from work today to take care of the wife cause she had her wisdom teeth yanked out. Was bored, so I coded up a site for pic hosting for anything supra related.

The site is http://www.suprapics.com. Upload some pics and show them here in this thread. Once all the kinks are worked out, it'll be a free service for supra/supra-related pics.

Please either PM me or post into this thread with feedback.

 

[Milenko]

Also, how come no one uses the forum attachments to upload pictures?

 

[Loki]

 

[GrimJack]

Also, how come no one uses the forum attachments to upload pictures?

DamnifIknow... it's so easy, I use it all the time.

 

[Loki]

I always forget that you can upload pics to the site, Milenko your site is nice. Easy to use and what not

 

[siman]

Some of my pictures are too big to go through the 'forum upload' thingamagig.....so I use imagestation ( which sucks ) and/or imageshack.....


but yours seems to be the easiest and best....LOL

 

[GrimJack]

Siman, how big are the images that you are trying to send? Dimensions and filesize, please. I basically just picked a big number when setting that value, if it's too small, I'd seriously consider revising it upwards.

 

[siman]

DSC03034.JPG:
File Too Large. Limits are 1600 x 1200. Your file is 2048 x 1536.

 

[GrimJack]

Dude! Who wants a 4 megapixel image over the internet??? I rarely shoot pictures that high when I am printing them!

 

[Paradox]

no shite, resize the pics to 1024x768 or so....

 

[siman]

the more megapixels the clearer the image.....doesnt everyone want clear images....

oh woops, this is the mk3 crowd.... :doublebir

 

[Jeff Lange]

No, the more megapixels, the larger the picture. Nobody wants to look at a picture that large on the internet, just resize it down, or continue using imageshack, but people (in general) do hate seeing pics that large on the internet.

 

[siman]

The more megapixels the bigger and the more indepth the picture can be.....

believe me, I am a camera freak...well now....since i still havent gotten the camera of my dreams yet....i just keep up with technology.

But yes, imageshack doesnt handle the resolution or something like that on their server...so they enlarge the photo....

weird.

 

[Jeff Lange]

Yeah, I work at Canon. I have many, many cameras (my dad worked for Canon for 23 years before I even started there). Obviously more megapixels means it's going to show more detail, etc; however, when you can only see 0.6 megapixels in your web-browser on a typical screen resolution, showing a 5.0 megapixel image and having to scroll left and right to see it doesn't really go over to well with most people... or maybe it's just me.

 

[GrimJack]

Ya, sure, it's just you. Doesn't everyone keep their desktop resolution at 3200x2400?

Seriously, that's too big for the internet. I resize mine to 1024x768, and note that anyone who wants a higher resolution photo can email me and I'll send it to them.

 

[siman]

haters.... :rofl:

 

[icepanthar22]

i like the image hosting - simple easy interface im a minimalist myself :biglaugh: