MKIII87Turbo said:
…In one of my automotive books it states, "Today's theromostats are also designed to slow down coolant flow when they are open. This helps to prevent overheating, which can result from the coolant moving too quickly, through the engine, to absorb enough heat".
It may have very well said that but keep in mind that no one or source is omnipotent (knowing absolutely everything). Any outside source, just as members, can make mistakes too.
I would definitely agree that the coolant within the radiator would have a cooler temperature if flow is reduced, but where the coolant is needed, in the engine, the coolant would be hotter. You can’t deny that at an extreme (very low to no circulation) the coolant within the radiator would be cool, but the coolant within the engine would be hot, and the heat exchange between the radiator and the ambient air would be minimal.
The more you increase flow, the hotter the radiator will be because it will have more coolant rushing in from the engine within a given time interval. The same effect will also occur to the engine: as you increase flow to the engine, it will run cooler because it will have more coolant rushing through it from the radiator at a given time interval. A higher flowing system would also have more consistent temperatures at various points within the system.
As stated, more flow will increase the temperature of the radiator, and with a hotter radiator, there will be more of a heat exchange between it and the ambient air. Increased temperature variations between the radiator and the ambient air means more heat exchange during a given time interval and more heat loss overall.
Shawndude said:
In a closed system, you really cannot move the coolant "too fast"…
Yes, but downfalls and reasons why manufacturers don’t make even higher flowing systems is because it would be overkill (not necessary), it would also rob some HP (very little), and increase wear on the water pump -- if the same basic pump was used but made to spin much faster.
About running a car without a thermostat:
Long ago my neighbor convinced me to try it -- I did. With our cars being as sophisticated as they are, the computers won’t like or know how to deal with a much cooler running temperature. When the car is cold, more gas is injected in the cylinders and you will have a higher fuel to air ratio. In my experience at 30F, I could easily see smoke (that is how rich it was) coming from the exhaust while I did a highway run for a couple of miles. Needless to say, I don’t want my cat’s blocked with carbon, or more carbon on my pistons which increase the chance for detonation, or want lower fuel efficiency, so I put a thermostat back on within hours of that experiment.
EDIT:
From now on I won't bother posting after Shawndude because he made some of the same points I did. In my defense I'd say that I was distracted while making this post and he beat me to it.